Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
-
If we are retroactivly updating with reasons, can we get the full blow by blow of Gentiles PM's to Admin?Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy -
I would prefer the full blow by blow of your PM's to Gentile.Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
I heard the potted version was "I love your techy posts baby. Please dominate me. Use the cheese grater. Until we meet, attached is a photo of my pen1s".
But I always assumed there was more to it that that.Comment
-
-
I don't suppose that that it's occurred to the congregation that some posters ask to be banned to allow them to get on with Real Life...."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
not that old chestnut again. AtW doesn't have a life he just thinks he has one.Originally posted by cojak View Postmerely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by cojak View Post
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
-
Or that AtW, being entitled to a custom title, chose "Banned" just to confuse peopleOriginally posted by cojak View Post
Comment
-
Why not just not login?Originally posted by cojak View Post
And if you want a ban why not just start a thread "Cojak blows goats" or something like that?
Sometimes I feel like posting my opinions on the s58 thread and I might ask for a ban before doing that.Comment
-
Oi Cojak, is this true?Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostWhy not just not login?
And if you want a ban why not just start a thread "Cojak blows goats" or something like that?
Comment
Comment