• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Online Safety Act

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    I think someone should start a thread in technical on how we can watch porn without revealing our identity.
    bloggoth

    If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
    John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

    Comment


      #32
      Poor chap

      https://metro.co.uk/2025/08/01/brita...face-23807955/

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
        He can probably sue for discrimination and make a packet. Maybe not so poor after all?

        Comment


          #34
          So 4Chan are going to refuse to pay any fines. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq68j5g2nr1o

          I can see plenty of others doing the same.
          England's greatest sailor since Nelson lost the armada.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Uncle Albert View Post
            So we probably end up with ISPs forced to block them by IP address. The "great wall" of Britain has begun.

            Comment


              #36
              Traffic to 4chan won't be affected. It's probably already accessed mostly via VPN anyway.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Uncle Albert View Post
                Of course. Only the Septics are allowed extraterritoriality.
                When the fun stops, STOP.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Paddy View Post
                  Excuse my ignorance, but what is the government’s definition of pornography? From what I can gather it includes plain nudity. If that is the case, the government should be banning all harmful content such a war games and alike and not nudity which is natural.
                  It's in section 236 in the legislation:

                  “pornographic content” means content of such a nature that it is reasonable to assume that it was produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal

                  It could in theory mean any content.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Ah, as with much recent legislation, drafted so poorly that it can cover a lot of ground and requires courts to establish boundaries.

                    Encouraging VPN use surely makes the role of policing national security more difficult since there's more traffic that's harder to monitor.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by m0n1k3r View Post

                      It's in section 236 in the legislation:

                      “pornographic content” means content of such a nature that it is reasonable to assume that it was produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal

                      It could in theory mean any content.
                      I hope that MP with the tractor fetish uses a VPN.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X