I think someone should start a thread in technical on how we can watch porn without revealing our identity.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Online Safety Act
Collapse
X
-
bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson) -
-
He can probably sue for discrimination and make a packet. Maybe not so poor after all?Originally posted by ladymuck View PostComment
-
So 4Chan are going to refuse to pay any fines. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq68j5g2nr1o
I can see plenty of others doing the same.England's greatest sailor since Nelson lost the armada.Comment
-
So we probably end up with ISPs forced to block them by IP address. The "great wall" of Britain has begun.Originally posted by Uncle Albert View PostSo 4Chan are going to refuse to pay any fines. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq68j5g2nr1o
I can see plenty of others doing the same.Comment
-
Comment
-
Of course. Only the Septics are allowed extraterritoriality.Originally posted by Uncle Albert View PostSo 4Chan are going to refuse to pay any fines. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq68j5g2nr1o
I can see plenty of others doing the same.When the fun stops, STOP.Comment
-
It's in section 236 in the legislation:Originally posted by Paddy View PostExcuse my ignorance, but what is the government’s definition of pornography? From what I can gather it includes plain nudity. If that is the case, the government should be banning all harmful content such a war games and alike and not nudity which is natural.
“pornographic content” means content of such a nature that it is reasonable to assume that it was produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal
It could in theory mean any content.Comment
-
Ah, as with much recent legislation, drafted so poorly that it can cover a lot of ground and requires courts to establish boundaries.
Encouraging VPN use surely makes the role of policing national security more difficult since there's more traffic that's harder to monitor.Comment
-
I hope that MP with the tractor fetish uses a VPN.Originally posted by m0n1k3r View Post
It's in section 236 in the legislation:
“pornographic content” means content of such a nature that it is reasonable to assume that it was produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal
It could in theory mean any content.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment