My reading is that the switch position is inferred from the electrical contact state, rather than e.g. video providing direct observation of the physical switch position.
This reading allows for the possibility that the connectors on the back of the switch may have made intermittent contact. So possibly the contact was disrupted when the plane was climbing, to be restored again when level / descending flight was reached.
I accept that this is perhaps less probable (given both switches) than human operation, but I don't think that the evidence made available allows for elimination of this possibility.
This reading allows for the possibility that the connectors on the back of the switch may have made intermittent contact. So possibly the contact was disrupted when the plane was climbing, to be restored again when level / descending flight was reached.
I accept that this is perhaps less probable (given both switches) than human operation, but I don't think that the evidence made available allows for elimination of this possibility.
Comment