• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Sir Kier Starmer - Odds on not completing a full term?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Renationalise the care "industry"...
    Or Soylent Green.

    Hard choices and all that.

    Comment


      #52
      So Care homes keeping confused little old ladies in a safe environment in a large old building. £1500 a week or £78,000 a year.

      Keeping "turbo nutter chainsaw Sid" the vicious armed robber in Prison only costs £50,000

      https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans...02-01.137931.h

      Seems someone is making money.

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by malvolio View Post

        Foreign students are fine, and they pay a huge amount into the universities. What's wrong is allowing them to bring in their families; they are here to study not work. When you have a proper job in the UK, then you can bring in everyone else.
        So, what you're saying is that someone comes here to do a PhD that could take 5 years and they have to do that alone, without their spouse and maybe their kids? I don't agree that they should bring parents, aunts, grandparents, siblings, etc but if they are married and (especially) if they have children then bringing their family should be allowed.

        Yeah, you could argue that they choose to come to the UK to study and so that's not the UK's problem but then you're failing to consider (a) university funding that subsidises the education for UK nationals and (b) some of those PhD students stay and contribute to society by working, conducting more research, setting up businesses, etc. If you tell them they can't bring their families, all that will go somewhere else.

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by ladymuck View Post

          So, what you're saying is that someone comes here to do a PhD that could take 5 years and they have to do that alone, without their spouse and maybe their kids? I don't agree that they should bring parents, aunts, grandparents, siblings, etc but if they are married and (especially) if they have children then bringing their family should be allowed.
          Yes I am. It's their choice if they do that. I'm not saying it's pleasant or even desirable, but it's not a right

          Yeah, you could argue that they choose to come to the UK to study and so that's not the UK's problem but then you're failing to consider (a) university funding that subsidises the education for UK nationals and (b) some of those PhD students stay and contribute to society by working, conducting more research, setting up businesses, etc. If you tell them they can't bring their families, all that will go somewhere else.
          No, I'm saying if they have a real job earning an income and contributing to the UK, then that's not an issue. But we have no obligation to find housing and social care for the families of non-earners. Which is the vast majority of students.
          Blog? What blog...?

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by vetran View Post
            So Care homes keeping confused little old ladies in a safe environment in a large old building. £1500 a week or £78,000 a year.

            Keeping "turbo nutter chainsaw Sid" the vicious armed robber in Prison only costs £50,000

            https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans...02-01.137931.h

            Seems someone is making money.
            You'd hope that Granny was getting better facilities, and more attentive care than Sid, hence perhaps the higher cost.

            The neighbour I was talking to likened care home costs to a hotel on full-board*. £700/week (£100/night) would only get you something basic.

            * actually the staff-to-residents ratio is probably higher in a care home, so even more expensive to run

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by woody1 View Post

              You'd hope that Granny was getting better facilities, and more attentive care than Sid, hence perhaps the higher cost.

              The neighbour I was talking to likened care home costs to a hotel on full-board*. £700/week (£100/night) would only get you something basic.

              * actually the staff-to-residents ratio is probably higher in a care home, so even more expensive to run
              Hmm apples to kumquats..

              What the elderly get is normally a studio flat normally personal or shared bathroom maybe cooking or coffee making and bedroom in basically one room. Prison is a custom built 6 by 8 frequently shared.

              https://www.travelodge.co.uk/blog/ti...room-under-39/

              https://www.rightmove.co.uk/property...dio-flats.html

              Definitely change out of £50 a night!

              staff
              https://www.instituteforgovernment.o...%20June%202010.

              1:3.8 - prison

              https://www.thecarewhisperer.co.uk/w...20same%20ratio.

              1:7 - care home
              Last edited by vetran; 12 July 2024, 11:03.

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by vetran View Post
                Definitely change out of £50 a night!
                Not full board though, nor 24x7 personal care.

                People usually end up in a care home because they can no longer look after themselves (eg. dementia). A studio flat would be no different to them staying at home, and definitely no substitute for a place in a care home.
                Last edited by woody1; 12 July 2024, 11:38.

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by woody1 View Post

                  Not full board though, nor 24x7 personal care.

                  People usually end up in a care home because they can no longer look after themselves (eg. dementia). A studio flat would be no different to them staying at home, and definitely no substitute for a place in a care home.
                  The pros of a good care home for a relative with dementia far outweigh the cons. You won't know that until you experience it (twice, in my case).

                  My MiL had to go into care. We used a private one for three years at which point the house had been sold and she was down to the pitifully small amount of personal savings. The council then stepped in and took over the payments. No change in care or accommodation. Perhaps we were lucky...
                  Blog? What blog...?

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Our neighbour is delaying putting his wife in for as long as he can, partly due to the cost. It's a terrible situation though, and very stressful on him and his son who lives at home. She's become a bit of a danger to herself (wandering off in the middle of the night etc) and a danger to the family (think of all the potential fire risks and other hazards in the home). Not good.

                    Comment


                      #60
                      To answer the original question, there is an intake of new Labour MPs who were carefully vetted and owe their seats to him. I doubt they will rock the vote for a considerable amount of time.

                      Famous last words but he does seem fairly whiter than white so a scandal seems unlikely so I would have thought the only way he won't see out a full term is if he stands down ahead of the next GE to give someone else a go.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X