• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Sorry Miss Beggum / Mrs Riedijk

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Oh help!

    I agree with you.

    Problem is she was a child when she left.

    So unless her TV interview could be used against her, any UK conviction would be based on her being 15 so the sentence would not be long enough.
    Not long enough? She's probably had a rough enough ride already tbh. I don't quite know how many babies of hers have died, and how long she's been stuck in a refugee camp, but I suspect she's had a worse time than a UK prison over the last few years. She was 15 when she was groomed online and left the UK - a child. The other girls she left with are dead. Does anyone think for a second that if she was a white middle class girl she wouldn't have been airlifted home by the RAF at the first opportunity? Renouncing citizenship is a scandal IMO and I am surprised more people aren't up in arms about it.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by mattster View Post

      Not long enough? She's probably had a rough enough ride already tbh. I don't quite know how many babies of hers have died, and how long she's been stuck in a refugee camp, but I suspect she's had a worse time than a UK prison over the last few years. She was 15 when she was groomed online and left the UK - a child. The other girls she left with are dead. Does anyone think for a second that if she was a white middle class girl she wouldn't have been airlifted home by the RAF at the first opportunity? Renouncing citizenship is a scandal IMO and I am surprised more people aren't up in arms about it.
      I also agree it's completely wrong and akin to (but on nowhere near the same level of wrongness as) Guantanamo. If you believe someone has done something wrong, give them their day in court and - if found guilty - impose the appropriate punishment. Banishing them into citizenship limbo is medieval and not the act of a civilised nation.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Snooky View Post

        I also agree it's completely wrong and akin to (but on nowhere near the same level of wrongness as) Guantanamo. If you believe someone has done something wrong, give them their day in court and - if found guilty - impose the appropriate punishment. Banishing them into citizenship limbo is medieval and not the act of a civilised nation.
        There is, of course, the deterrent value.

        In my personal opinion, let her back in and she'll need protection - and not just from the Daily Wail readers. If she ain't here she ain't our problem.

        Btw, mattster, she didn't renounce her UK citizenship, she had it removed.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by mattster View Post
          I don't quite know how many babies of hers have died
          Three.

          There's a fascinating pod cast about her called "I am not a monster". The woman who enticed the three to come over is still involved with the remnants of ISIS, and tries to raise funds under the guise of charitable donations.

          Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
            There is, of course, the deterrent value.
            By that measure, we should also banish murderers, rapists and others who've done far worse things than her.

            The death sentence isn't a sufficient deterrent to stop others committing murder, why would Shamima Begum's banishment prevent some other idealistic teenager from foolishly going off to support an unsavoury cause?

            This is quite blatantly our government just playing to the Mail/Sun audience to garner favour.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Zigenare View Post

              There is, of course, the deterrent value.
              No deterrent.

              Teenage brains are simply just too immature.

              ​​​​​​
              "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Snooky View Post
                By that measure, we should also banish murderers, rapists and others who've done far worse things than her.

                The death sentence isn't a sufficient deterrent to stop others committing murder, why would Shamima Begum's banishment prevent some other idealistic teenager from foolishly going off to support an unsavoury cause?

                This is quite blatantly our government just playing to the Mail/Sun audience to garner favour.
                Or the government agreeing to a clearly demonstrated wish to damage the country by aligning with a terrorist organisation. Bangladesh doesn't want her back for the same reason. Yes she is a silly little girl who has learned a harsh lesson - but that doesn't then mean we have to bail her out.
                Blog? What blog...?

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                  Oh help!

                  I agree with you.

                  Problem is she was a child when she left.

                  So unless her TV interview could be used against her, any UK conviction would be based on her being 15 so the sentence would not be long enough.
                  she should join Hamas - would fit right in!

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Snooky View Post
                    By that measure, we should also banish murderers, rapists and others who've done far worse things than her.

                    The death sentence isn't a sufficient deterrent to stop others committing murder, why would Shamima Begum's banishment prevent some other idealistic teenager from foolishly going off to support an unsavoury cause?

                    This is quite blatantly our government just playing to the Mail/Sun audience to garner favour.
                    we do try but they claim they are Asylum seekers.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by vetran View Post

                      we do try but they claim they are Asylum seekers.
                      You seem to have forgot the home grown, particularly politicians and members of the clergy, who only have one passport.
                      "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X