Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
<OFFICIAL> Truss Resigns!
Collapse
X
-
Whenever I hear the 1922 committee I imagine it looks like this.
First Law of Contracting: Only the strong survive -
talking to the furniture now? - oh, dearOriginally posted by SueEllen View PostShe is in a meeting with the chair of the 1922 committee!
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...source=twitter
He who Hingeth aboot, Getteth Hee Haw. https://forums.contractoruk.com/core...ies/smokin.gifComment
-
She should be gone by the end of the day according to rumours"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Can't see her resigning .... she'll need to be pushed out. But then who takes over?
One Tory MP has said the voting for a new PM should be MPs only ... got to say, I totally agree. The MPs have been voted in to run the country (yes, I see the irony of me saying that) so they should be allowed to appoint the leader that they think will best deliver the agenda.
Members had their say in the general election, I don't see why a small minority of the UK then gets to pick the PM.
Same goes for Labour and their members ... should be Labour MPs who select their leader too.I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter man
Comment
-
Which Joker they got lined up as a replacement?Originally posted by SueEllen View PostShe should be gone by the end of the day according to rumours
First Law of Contracting: Only the strong surviveComment
-
I was thinking the other day that the votes are backwards.Originally posted by Whorty View PostCan't see her resigning .... she'll need to be pushed out. But then who takes over?
One Tory MP has said the voting for a new PM should be MPs only ... got to say, I totally agree. The MPs have been voted in to run the country (yes, I see the irony of me saying that) so they should be allowed to appoint the leader that they think will best deliver the agenda.
Members had their say in the general election, I don't see why a small minority of the UK then gets to pick the PM.
Same goes for Labour and their members ... should be Labour MPs who select their leader too.
Members in a party should shorten the list to the top few candidates.
MPs in that party should choose out of those top few candidates as they have to be led and work with them."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
So what role does the Party have? I don't disagree with the principle but each party can make up its own rules how it appoints leaders and that's their business.Originally posted by Whorty View PostCan't see her resigning .... she'll need to be pushed out. But then who takes over?
One Tory MP has said the voting for a new PM should be MPs only ... got to say, I totally agree. The MPs have been voted in to run the country (yes, I see the irony of me saying that) so they should be allowed to appoint the leader that they think will best deliver the agenda.
Members had their say in the general election, I don't see why a small minority of the UK then gets to pick the PM.
Same goes for Labour and their members ... should be Labour MPs who select their leader too.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
I think the logic is that MPs have the direct ear of their constituents so have a greater idea of what will wash with the public than the party membership, who are often the more radical end (in either direction) of the electorate.
I was discussing with HWMBO last night as I too was annoyed at MPs overriding the will of the membership.
However, if as SE suggests, the process was flipped - membership shortlists the top x candidates and then the MPs vote for the leader then that still involves them but also limits the damage that could be done by selecting someone bonkers.Comment
-
I've never been so glad - and I guess others are too - that Corbyn was only the opposition leader.Originally posted by ladymuck View PostI think the logic is that MPs have the direct ear of their constituents so have a greater idea of what will wash with the public than the party membership, who are often the more radical end (in either direction) of the electorate.
I was discussing with HWMBO last night as I too was annoyed at MPs overriding the will of the membership.
However, if as SE suggests, the process was flipped - membership shortlists the top x candidates and then the MPs vote for the leader then that still involves them but also limits the damage that could be done by selecting someone bonkers.
Hopefully after this political parties are more careful with how they run leadership elections."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Tory Party Chairman, Jake Berry, has gone into number 10."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment