• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Mini Budget aka Fiscal Statement

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SueEllen
    replied
    Hunt talking now:
    • He's agreed with the speaker he can make this announcement to lead to stability in the markets.
    • All tax measures being reversed that haven't been started. So stamp duty cut and reversal on health and social care levy will go ahead as the legislation has been started.
    • Basic rate cut will remain at 20% indefinitely.
    • Measures will raise £32B per year
    • Energy price cap will be reviewed from April 2023 but will go ahead this winter.
    • There will be spending cuts in government departments (Austerity 2.0)
    Last edited by SueEllen; 17 October 2022, 10:17.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

    Life comes at you fast. I dare say we’ve all made confident predictions that turned out to be utter crap, especially w/r to politics over the last 10 years.
    I'm still gorgeous 10 years later!

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    The candidates for leadership of the Tory Party knew exactly to whom they had to appeal - the Party Members. That is how the system works. TPTB didn't like the result - what is happening now is setting a dangerous precedent. Soon no-one will have a vote, or certainly not one that matters. It was no accident of fate that the Irish were forced to vote again in the Treaty of Lisbon referendums (or "referenda" dependent on your school of thought) .
    What has the Tory leadership got to do with an Irish referendum?
    You realise that the partition of Ireland took place over 100 years ago, so the Tories aren't running it, focus on the UK's current clownfest and think back as to why we've had them ruining the country for so long.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post

    And that's the sort of deluded nonsense you hear from Tory MPs which shows quite how distant they are from the real world and why they are doomed for a pasting. Even know there is a vocal minority who think Boris should be back in charge.

    Look at the by-elections we have had since party-gate... massive protest votes largely targeted at Boris. I don't think that's a great way to vote but being pragmatic Boris had 'lost the dressing room' regardless of what was 'right'.

    The Tory MPs wanted Rishi as PM, the 'self serving vote' came from the party members. A bit like Corbyn, the party members have royally screwed their own party.
    The candidates for leadership of the Tory Party knew exactly to whom they had to appeal - the Party Members. That is how the system works. TPTB didn't like the result - what is happening now is setting a dangerous precedent. Soon no-one will have a vote, or certainly not one that matters. It was no accident of fate that the Irish were forced to vote again in the Treaty of Lisbon referendums (or "referenda" dependent on your school of thought) .

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Dark Black View Post

    Shouldn't have got rid of Boris then should they, self-serving idiots.

    The man was far from perfect, but was the best chance they had of winning another term in the near future.
    And that's the sort of deluded nonsense you hear from Tory MPs which shows quite how distant they are from the real world and why they are doomed for a pasting. Even know there is a vocal minority who think Boris should be back in charge.

    Look at the by-elections we have had since party-gate... massive protest votes largely targeted at Boris. I don't think that's a great way to vote but being pragmatic Boris had 'lost the dressing room' regardless of what was 'right'.

    The Tory MPs wanted Rishi as PM, the 'self serving vote' came from the party members. A bit like Corbyn, the party members have royally screwed their own party.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    It's all going really well for Liz. What's the record for shortest serving UK PM?

    Of more note, when the Tories got their landslide victory last GE and all the Red Wall stuff, commentators confidently asserted "this sort of dominance guarantees them the next GE, no go9vernment ever loses this sort of lead in a single term". And now not only are they set to lose, it's not even looking close and more than possibly a landslide of the same size t'other way.

    Of course that's reliant on Labour not cocking it up so maybe it's 50:50. Keir doesn't need to do anything but he or the PLP could easily steal disaster from victory at any moment.
    Life comes at you fast. I dare say we’ve all made confident predictions that turned out to be utter crap, especially w/r to politics over the last 10 years.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dark Black
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    It's all going really well for Liz. What's the record for shortest serving UK PM?

    Of more note, when the Tories got their landslide victory last GE and all the Red Wall stuff, commentators confidently asserted "this sort of dominance guarantees them the next GE, no go9vernment ever loses this sort of lead in a single term". And now not only are they set to lose, it's not even looking close and more than possibly a landslide of the same size t'other way.

    Of course that's reliant on Labour not cocking it up so maybe it's 50:50. Keir doesn't need to do anything but he or the PLP could easily steal disaster from victory at any moment.
    Shouldn't have got rid of Boris then should they, self-serving idiots.

    The man was far from perfect, but was the best chance they had of winning another term in the near future.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    It's all going really well for Liz. What's the record for shortest serving UK PM?

    Of more note, when the Tories got their landslide victory last GE and all the Red Wall stuff, commentators confidently asserted "this sort of dominance guarantees them the next GE, no go9vernment ever loses this sort of lead in a single term". And now not only are they set to lose, it's not even looking close and more than possibly a landslide of the same size t'other way.

    Of course that's reliant on Labour not cocking it up so maybe it's 50:50. Keir doesn't need to do anything but he or the PLP could easily steal disaster from victory at any moment.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    Perhaps look at the hiring process for the NHS, the qualifications needed even to apply, the quota requirements, the time it takes and the rewards on offer, across all the disciplines (there are a lot more people involved in healthcare than "doctors and nurses"). Then talk about workforce planning.
    You've made the mistake in not realising that other posters have family members who work and have recently worked at different levels, including high up, in the NHS and have had to listen to years of their moans.

    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    These are complicated issues, compounded by much largely irrelevant legislation and far too much bureaucracy. It's not in any one person's scope to resolve them.
    Actually that's what the government especially the Health Secretary is there for.

    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    As for Parliament doing it - well good luck with that one. If Hunt had come up with a rational plan of what needed doing, it would never get through the House. It would need a major majority, a brave PM and a Health Minister with the full support of his Cabinet and party even to come up with the plan. WE had one of them a month or so back, now we haven't.
    Odd how the Lansley reforms could be pushed through with so much opposition. I believe the Tory's were in coalition when they were pushed through...

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post

    So it is knee jerk politics to do workforce planning which the doctors unions and other health unions asked the government that has been in power for 12 years to do?

    It is knee jerk politics to sort out a mechanism to stop doctors paying into their pensions so they don't retire early which the government in power had 12 years to sort out?

    Etc
    If the party in power could force through the Lansley reforms and junior doctors pay deal, I'm sure if they had the willing they could have sorted out the 2 issues I've mentioned above plus other things that have already been mentioned.
    Perhaps look at the hiring process for the NHS, the qualifications needed even to apply, the quota requirements, the time it takes and the rewards on offer, across all the disciplines (there are a lot more people involved in healthcare than "doctors and nurses"). Then talk about workforce planning.

    These are complicated issues, compounded by much largely irrelevant legislation and far too much bureaucracy. It's not in any one person's scope to resolve them.

    As for Parliament doing it - well good luck with that one. If Hunt had come up with a rational plan of what needed doing, it would never get through the House. It would need a major majority, a brave PM and a Health Minister with the full support of his Cabinet and party even to come up with the plan. WE had one of them a month or so back, now we haven't.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X