• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Excellent news

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    https://www.richmondandtwickenhamtim...-slowed-geese/

    This made me laugh, however I feel sorry for the motorist, who will have to pay for the damage to her car, since the cyclist doesn't have 3rd party insurance. Cyclists are an absolute plague in Richmond Park, as they're all trying to be the fastest on some sort of cycling app. We used to moan about them ignoring traffic lights (which hasn't changed) but now all the roads are 20mph the cyclists are cheerfully ignoring the speed limits as well.
    I know of someone who died cycling into the back of open van doors. They did have insurance but I don't know if the van owner followed it up....
    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

    Comment


      #12
      So many cyclists on road is clearly irritating people, had to break several times in recent months due to people overtaking them. Couple of near accidents, one was doing it on a blind bend and another at a junction when I was about to turn left.
      bloggoth

      If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
      John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

      Comment


        #13
        Little something about cycling from the Swiss police. Doesn't need sound or German comprehension.

        Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
          So many cyclists on road is clearly irritating people, had to break several times in recent months due to people overtaking them. Couple of near accidents, one was doing it on a blind bend and another at a junction when I was about to turn left.
          The roads are for those who don't need a license to use them so motorcycle, car, van, lorry and bus drivers just have to put up with it.

          And remember most people travel around by more than one means....
          "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Mordac View Post
            https://www.richmondandtwickenhamtim...-slowed-geese/

            This made me laugh, however I feel sorry for the motorist, who will have to pay for the damage to her car, since the cyclist doesn't have 3rd party insurance. Cyclists are an absolute plague in Richmond Park, as they're all trying to be the fastest on some sort of cycling app. We used to moan about them ignoring traffic lights (which hasn't changed) but now all the roads are 20mph the cyclists are cheerfully ignoring the speed limits as well.
            So the cyclist was riding without due care and attention? If it were a car behind it would be clear who is at fault.

            Well a civil suit supported by the insurance company should sort that out. Make the cyclist pay for their stupidity and the damage they caused.

            Cyclists should be insured IMHO.
            Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by vetran View Post

              So the cyclist was riding without due care and attention? If it were a car behind it would be clear who is at fault.

              Well a civil suit supported by the insurance company should sort that out. Make the cyclist pay for their stupidity and the damage they caused.

              Cyclists should be insured IMHO.
              You can still be sued if you have no insurance - a cyclist found this out when he went into a dumb walker.

              However because cyclists are seen as more vulnerable, it is hard for car drivers to prove the cyclist was at fault.

              So the car driver would need witnesses to show she stopped for wild life and wasn't just a crap driver.
              "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Sue the Lawyer View Post

                You can still be sued if you have no insurance - a cyclist found this out when he went into a dumb walker.

                However because cyclists are seen as more vulnerable, it is hard for car drivers to prove the cyclist was at fault.

                So the car driver would need witnesses to show she stopped for wild life and wasn't just a crap driver.
                the cyclist can stop faster than any car driver if her brake lights worked then the cyclist needs witnesses to explain why they ran into a stationary object.

                More vulnerable is not less culpable.
                Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Mordac View Post
                  https://www.richmondandtwickenhamtim...-slowed-geese/

                  This made me laugh, however I feel sorry for the motorist, who will have to pay for the damage to her car, since the cyclist doesn't have 3rd party insurance.
                  The news article doesn't mention anything about insurance. Do you have a source for that, or you just stating your opinion as fact?

                  There's no legal obligation for cyclists to have 3rd party insurance, but a lot of cyclists have it anyway. For instance, it comes bundled with membership of Cycling UK and the London Cycling Campaign:
                  Insurance for cycling | Cycling UK
                  Third Party Insurance | London Cycling Campaign (lcc.org.uk)
                  It also gets included in some home insurance policies.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post

                    I know of someone who died cycling into the back of open van doors. They did have insurance but I don't know if the van owner followed it up....
                    Chap I used to cycle with is now paraplegic after cycling into the back of a stationary van - he was on a time trial bike, so in full aero position and doing 25+mph ... just didn't realise the van was stationary and hit the back of it. Broke his spine, in IC for weeks. Now learning to ride with a hand cycle, but he'll never walk again. Tragic, but accidents happen.
                    Last edited by Whorty; 31 December 2021, 18:40.
                    I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter man

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by vetran View Post

                      the cyclist can stop faster than any car driver if her brake lights worked then the cyclist needs witnesses to explain why they ran into a stationary object.

                      More vulnerable is not less culpable.
                      Yes ... and no. If we make it that the larger vehicle has to prove that it was not their fault, then the larger vehicles will take more care .. from lorries down. As a cyclist I have lots of cars that drive like absolute idiots around me ... I've never ever had a car crash, so I think I'm pretty experienced on roads and I cycle in the same safe way as I drive. Some of these drivers need to get out there and ride a bike, and see how vulnerable you are against a 3 ton piece of metal, and then maybe drivers would be more cautious.

                      Maybe. But then, maybe not.
                      I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter man

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X