- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Sacked for 90p
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Except he wasn't sacked for 90p, he was sacked for being dishonest... Different matter altogether, giving his job.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Complete waste of police time and resources.
While other plod with nicknames like 'rapist' and openly into rape pron are ignored.
Comment
-
both are valid grievances. Though I would sack / imprison the rapist and give the thief a final warning.Originally posted by Fraidycat View PostComplete waste of police time and resources.
While other plod with nicknames like 'rapist' and openly into rape pron are ignored.Comment
-
Good job.
I have little time and no sympathy whatsoever for public officers of any type who engage in this type of thing or anything worse than this.Former IPSE member
My WebsiteComment
-
I was a week late with my thread. You are two weeks late.Originally posted by Win View Post"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Exactly. Seems a bit harsh on the surface, but dishonesty is dishonesty, and in some professions there is zero tolerance for it (politicians excepted, natch). Another way of looking at it is, if you are going to lie about something as trivial as 90p, what else are you going to lie about?Originally posted by malvolio View PostExcept he wasn't sacked for 90p, he was sacked for being dishonest... Different matter altogether, giving his job.Comment
-
Mine is a sackable offenceOriginally posted by SueEllen View Post
I was a week late with my thread. You are two weeks late.
Comment
-
It is an interesting point, about one's behaviour for illicit gain, logic would say that a person would take risk when the expected gains are higher, but perhaps a lot of people take risk for gains which are minimal. Maybe the instantaneous reward from those acts of immorality weighs larger.Originally posted by mattster View Post
Exactly. Seems a bit harsh on the surface, but dishonesty is dishonesty, and in some professions there is zero tolerance for it (politicians excepted, natch). Another way of looking at it is, if you are going to lie about something as trivial as 90p, what else are you going to lie about?
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Today 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Yesterday 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Jul 14 07:45
- IT contractor demand cools in June 2026 amid UK heatwave Jul 13 08:18
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40
- Three Loan Charge conflicts of interest show Labour ministers knew the McCann Review was compromised from the start Jul 7 05:44

Comment