- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Sacked for 90p
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Except he wasn't sacked for 90p, he was sacked for being dishonest... Different matter altogether, giving his job.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Complete waste of police time and resources.
While other plod with nicknames like 'rapist' and openly into rape pron are ignored.
Comment
-
both are valid grievances. Though I would sack / imprison the rapist and give the thief a final warning.Originally posted by Fraidycat View PostComplete waste of police time and resources.
While other plod with nicknames like 'rapist' and openly into rape pron are ignored.Comment
-
Good job.
I have little time and no sympathy whatsoever for public officers of any type who engage in this type of thing or anything worse than this.Former IPSE member
My WebsiteComment
-
I was a week late with my thread. You are two weeks late.Originally posted by Win View Post"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Exactly. Seems a bit harsh on the surface, but dishonesty is dishonesty, and in some professions there is zero tolerance for it (politicians excepted, natch). Another way of looking at it is, if you are going to lie about something as trivial as 90p, what else are you going to lie about?Originally posted by malvolio View PostExcept he wasn't sacked for 90p, he was sacked for being dishonest... Different matter altogether, giving his job.Comment
-
Mine is a sackable offenceOriginally posted by SueEllen View Post
I was a week late with my thread. You are two weeks late.
Comment
-
It is an interesting point, about one's behaviour for illicit gain, logic would say that a person would take risk when the expected gains are higher, but perhaps a lot of people take risk for gains which are minimal. Maybe the instantaneous reward from those acts of immorality weighs larger.Originally posted by mattster View Post
Exactly. Seems a bit harsh on the surface, but dishonesty is dishonesty, and in some professions there is zero tolerance for it (politicians excepted, natch). Another way of looking at it is, if you are going to lie about something as trivial as 90p, what else are you going to lie about?
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Today 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Yesterday 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45

Comment