- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Sacked for 90p
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Except he wasn't sacked for 90p, he was sacked for being dishonest... Different matter altogether, giving his job.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Complete waste of police time and resources.
While other plod with nicknames like 'rapist' and openly into rape pron are ignored.
Comment
-
both are valid grievances. Though I would sack / imprison the rapist and give the thief a final warning.Originally posted by Fraidycat View PostComplete waste of police time and resources.
While other plod with nicknames like 'rapist' and openly into rape pron are ignored.Comment
-
Good job.
I have little time and no sympathy whatsoever for public officers of any type who engage in this type of thing or anything worse than this.Former IPSE member
My WebsiteComment
-
I was a week late with my thread. You are two weeks late.Originally posted by Win View Post"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Exactly. Seems a bit harsh on the surface, but dishonesty is dishonesty, and in some professions there is zero tolerance for it (politicians excepted, natch). Another way of looking at it is, if you are going to lie about something as trivial as 90p, what else are you going to lie about?Originally posted by malvolio View PostExcept he wasn't sacked for 90p, he was sacked for being dishonest... Different matter altogether, giving his job.Comment
-
Mine is a sackable offenceOriginally posted by SueEllen View Post
I was a week late with my thread. You are two weeks late.
Comment
-
It is an interesting point, about one's behaviour for illicit gain, logic would say that a person would take risk when the expected gains are higher, but perhaps a lot of people take risk for gains which are minimal. Maybe the instantaneous reward from those acts of immorality weighs larger.Originally posted by mattster View Post
Exactly. Seems a bit harsh on the surface, but dishonesty is dishonesty, and in some professions there is zero tolerance for it (politicians excepted, natch). Another way of looking at it is, if you are going to lie about something as trivial as 90p, what else are you going to lie about?
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Today 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Yesterday 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16

Comment