- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Sacked for 90p
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Except he wasn't sacked for 90p, he was sacked for being dishonest... Different matter altogether, giving his job.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Complete waste of police time and resources.
While other plod with nicknames like 'rapist' and openly into rape pron are ignored.
Comment
-
both are valid grievances. Though I would sack / imprison the rapist and give the thief a final warning.Originally posted by Fraidycat View PostComplete waste of police time and resources.
While other plod with nicknames like 'rapist' and openly into rape pron are ignored.Comment
-
Good job.
I have little time and no sympathy whatsoever for public officers of any type who engage in this type of thing or anything worse than this.Former IPSE member
My WebsiteComment
-
I was a week late with my thread. You are two weeks late.Originally posted by Win View Post"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Exactly. Seems a bit harsh on the surface, but dishonesty is dishonesty, and in some professions there is zero tolerance for it (politicians excepted, natch). Another way of looking at it is, if you are going to lie about something as trivial as 90p, what else are you going to lie about?Originally posted by malvolio View PostExcept he wasn't sacked for 90p, he was sacked for being dishonest... Different matter altogether, giving his job.Comment
-
Mine is a sackable offenceOriginally posted by SueEllen View Post
I was a week late with my thread. You are two weeks late.
Comment
-
It is an interesting point, about one's behaviour for illicit gain, logic would say that a person would take risk when the expected gains are higher, but perhaps a lot of people take risk for gains which are minimal. Maybe the instantaneous reward from those acts of immorality weighs larger.Originally posted by mattster View Post
Exactly. Seems a bit harsh on the surface, but dishonesty is dishonesty, and in some professions there is zero tolerance for it (politicians excepted, natch). Another way of looking at it is, if you are going to lie about something as trivial as 90p, what else are you going to lie about?
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- VAT compliance checks are changing — here’s what contractors need to know Today 07:30
- As HMRC steps up VAT compliance activity, how should company directors prepare? Yesterday 06:52
- Hiring of IT contractors returned to growth in May 2026, following 33 months ‘in the red’ Jun 15 06:02
- Zero Hours Contract Reform: A key consultation for recruiters, employers and contractors is finally here Jun 12 04:43
- Bills of Exchange: Here’s what caught my attention as an umbrella compliance expert Jun 11 03:46
- Loan charge recall issue returns, with new demands making UK contractors ‘half-suicidal’ Jun 10 03:58
- AI interviews are here. Here's how IT contractors can ace them Jun 9 06:53
- Closing your limited company isn't failure. It's just the end of a chapter. Jun 8 05:00
- Young people not in education, employment or training isn’t a contractor’s problem. It’s a problem for us all Jun 5 05:26
- How does HMRC’s forward interest change benefit contractors? Jun 4 04:22

Comment