until he got an email from the DVLA saying he was no longer the owner.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
We Buy Any Car...
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Bodger View Post
Totally not true.
I've sold two cars, 16 and 14 years old, to them. They'll take anything as long as it's running (and to be honest, the last car I sold them wouldn't even start on the day they inspected it, the guy didn't care).
If you want to get rid of a banger and get a few quid for it, it's a good system.
Actually was trying to get rid of a 17 year old banger and got a £150 offer from "we buy any car" from which they then wanted a £50 admin fee when we dropped it off and to deduct money if they felt it was below the standard they expected.
Went to "remove my car" they gave us £350 and collected as is within a couple of days.
£250 up on their offer.Comment
-
I'm sure he meant registered keeperOriginally posted by vwdan View Post
Well that's a lie, given DVLA don't record owners.
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Last time I had dealings with them they only ever offered the Glasss' lowest estimate for a basket case. Regardless of condition.Comment
-
Bang to rights doing what, though? He was trying to sell a car, WBAC inspected it and agreed to buy it, but then pulled out because they thought he has a dealer. Why would they care whether or not he is a dealer? They are in the business of buying and selling cars, and presumably thought the price was reasonable when they agreed to buy it, and the car OK once they inspected it. There is some part of the story missing here.Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
Exactly this. He's been caught bang to rights IMO. That said they've properly screwed up the process changing the V5 and the like. Catch him out, reverse it all to the situation before the sale fair enough but he'll get his car back with two extra owners on it isn't very fair.Comment
-
They seem to have some limitations on dealing with businesses, vs dealing with consumers. And remember, pretending you're acting as a consumer when actually acting as a business is an offence!Originally posted by mattster View Post
Bang to rights doing what, though? He was trying to sell a car, WBAC inspected it and agreed to buy it, but then pulled out because they thought he has a dealer. Why would they care whether or not he is a dealer? They are in the business of buying and selling cars, and presumably thought the price was reasonable when they agreed to buy it, and the car OK once they inspected it. There is some part of the story missing here.Comment
-
I'm sure it's in the small print somewhereOriginally posted by mattster View Post
Bang to rights doing what, though? He was trying to sell a car, WBAC inspected it and agreed to buy it, but then pulled out because they thought he has a dealer. Why would they care whether or not he is a dealer? They are in the business of buying and selling cars, and presumably thought the price was reasonable when they agreed to buy it, and the car OK once they inspected it. There is some part of the story missing here.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Today 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Yesterday 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31

Comment