• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Business Phone Account - did I do this right?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by SteelyDan View Post
    I'm sure, in the grand scheme of things, there are other, more important things to worry about than whether a phone contract is in co. name, or personal name, & whether you're ok to claim it, & call charges, as exps. If you get it wrong, then I'm sure someone will say 'pay it back', or whatever, as & when the error is discovered...if that were to ever happen, of course.
    In the grand scheme of things, you may as well buy a big TV and claim it's a monitor, and if you were ever investigated say "I'll pay it back"...
    Best Forum Advisor 2014
    Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
    Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by SteelyDan View Post
      I'm sure, in the grand scheme of things, there are other, more important things to worry about than whether a phone contract is in co. name, or personal name, & whether you're ok to claim it, & call charges, as exps. If you get it wrong, then I'm sure someone will say 'pay it back', or whatever, as & when the error is discovered...if that were to ever happen, of course.
      Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
      In the grand scheme of things, you may as well buy a big TV and claim it's a monitor, and if you were ever investigated say "I'll pay it back"...
      Not really the same IMHO. Putting a domestic TV through the books is clearly evasion. Failing to get a mobile contract put in the right name is an admin error that, mentioned anecdotally by an accountant on here, is something HRMC would not tend to get excited about.

      That's not to say that an OCD approach to claiming expenses correctly is in any way wrong though.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by heyya99 View Post
        When I asked my accountant about putting a hone through my company, she said I could do it as long as I 'keep my personal calls to a minimum'. Considering 99.99999% of my phone's use will be personal related, I've decided to revert to original policy of keep my proverbial nose clean and not abuse expenses. Therefore, I have cancelled my phone contract, returned my 'business-bought' phone and have ordered a one in my own name.
        If you want to keep your nose clean then it's important to be able to rely on the advice received. I would be more concerned that your accountant appears to be ignoring/unaware of HMRC published guidance and concessions, and instead are making up rules purely based on their own opinion.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by Contreras View Post
          If you want to keep your nose clean then it's important to be able to rely on the advice received. I would be more concerned that your accountant appears to be ignoring/unaware of HMRC published guidance and concessions, and instead are making up rules purely based on their own opinion.
          She has given me the guidelines from HMRC. I think she has a point that if I'm buying the phone for persoanl use and using it for the occasional business use, it's hardly the approach HMRC are allowing.

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by heyya99 View Post
            She has given me the guidelines from HMRC. I think she has a point that if I'm buying the phone for persoanl use and using it for the occasional business use, it's hardly the approach HMRC are allowing.
            I don't know what guidelines you are looking at but personal/business use mix is irrelevant. The provision of a single mobile phone to a director/employee is exempt from tax. It's that simple.

            EIM21780 - Particular benefits: mobile telephones: general overview

            http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/eimanual/EIM21779.htm

            Provision of additional phones are subject to the normal wholly and exclusively rule.
            Last edited by TheCyclingProgrammer; 10 December 2014, 20:49.

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by heyya99 View Post
              She has given me the guidelines from HMRC. I think she has a point that if I'm buying the phone for persoanl use and using it for the occasional business use, it's hardly the approach HMRC are allowing.
              I don't think you understood her.

              You should try finding an accountant who can explain things to you in a way you understand them.
              "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                I don't think you understood her.

                You should try finding an accountant who can explain things to you in a way you understand them.
                and uses a lot of colourful pictures to help....
                'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                Comment


                  #48
                  There's a lot of jealousy in this forum.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View Post
                    I don't know what guidelines you are looking at but personal/business use mix is irrelevant. The provision of a single mobile phone to a director/employee is exempt from tax. It's that simple.

                    EIM21780 - Particular benefits: mobile telephones: general overview

                    EIM21779 - Particular benefits: mobile telephones: exemption for 2006/07 onwards: details

                    Provision of additional phones are subject to the normal wholly and exclusively rule.
                    This. If the accountant doesn't get such basic things right as this, what else are they missing?
                    Best Forum Advisor 2014
                    Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                    Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by heyya99 View Post
                      There's a lot of bull5hit & scaremongering in this forum.
                      FTFY

                      Rely on your accountant, that's why you have one (& common sense if possible) not a bunch of random armchair advisers/critics on here who, at times, are far too quick to pull the trigger on the uninitiated. They're generally a nice, knowledgeable bunch, but at times some of them show their teeth.
                      Clarity is everything

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X