• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The Official Brexit Supreme Court thread.

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by GB9 View Post
    Maybe, but have they got what they are really after?
    Again! What's that?
    http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
      Again! What's that?
      The government is delaying.
      "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by Mordac View Post
        Well the referendum which took place when we went in (or technically just after) was taken as binding enough, what about this one?
        You think it was binding, do you?

        Who told you that?
        "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
        - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
          Again! What's that?
          I think they are trying to identify what they need to put to Parliament.

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by cojak View Post
            You think it was binding, do you?

            Who told you that?
            I was only about 6 at the time, but the vote was to stay in (the EEC as was) so we stayed. I'd call that binding. I don't recall having read about "Outers" kicking up much fuss then. Mind you, back then it was just a free trade movement, now it's a retirement junket for failed politicians, a fairly useless and cumbersome bureaucracy, and a corrupt bunch of freeloaders lording it up on taxpayers money and not having to account for any of it. Oh, and most of them don't even have to worry about the mere inconvenience of democracy.
            His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Mordac View Post
              I was only about 6 at the time, but the vote was to stay in (the EEC as was) so we stayed. I'd call that binding.
              You really don't see that a vote to keep things the same and a vote to change something are totally different?
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                You really don't see that a vote to keep things the same and a vote to change something are totally different?
                https://www.theguardian.com/politics...like-last-time

                The decision to join the EEC was taken by Edward Heath’s government in 1973, but Labour’s manifesto promised a referendum on Britain’s ongoing membership.
                we were asked to remain in 75, we weren't asked if we should join or whether we should sign up to ever closer union.

                Both leave & remain were voting for change based on history. James O'Brien was likening Brexit to going out of a door not sure what was on the other side. I see it as jumping off a freight train with no published destination or even any certainty the tracks are laid ahead.

                Remain = EU superstate by Stealth
                Leave = Economic Armageddon apparently.
                Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                Comment


                  #68
                  Interesting point raised by Lord Pannick QC (for Respondant). Hansard recorded that the government assured Scotland that a referendum result in favour of Brexit would need an overall majority vote plus a majority votes in each of England-Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland
                  "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
                    Interesting point raised by Lord Pannick QC (for Respondant). Hansard recorded that the government assured Scotland that a referendum result in favour of Brexit would need an overall majority vote plus a majority votes in each of England-Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland
                    oops

                    We Jimmie will get her referendum. Scooter will be pleased.
                    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by Paddy View Post
                      Interesting point raised by Lord Pannick QC (for Respondant). Hansard recorded that the government assured Scotland that a referendum result in favour of Brexit would need an overall majority vote plus a majority votes in each of England-Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland
                      That wasn't on the ballot.
                      http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X