• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The Official Brexit Supreme Court thread.

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Hiding in my Swiss nuclear bunker.
    Switzerland is always neutral anyway.
    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
      Switzerland is always neutral anyway.
      And billionaire despots don't bomb their stash of cash, or nuke their gold bars.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
        And billionaire despots don't bomb their stash of cash, or nuke their gold bars.
        Unless it's everyone else's gold bars, like goldfinger.

        Comment


          #44
          Just a thought, but if the govt loses (and judging by the way the judges treated the govt QC) that is starting to look worryingly likely, can they take it to Judge Rinder?
          His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by Mordac View Post
            Just a thought, but if the govt loses (and judging by the way the judges treated the govt QC) that is starting to look worryingly likely, can they take it to Judge Rinder?
            Ask the audience? Nope, already done that. Decided to ignore their answer.

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by GB9 View Post
              Ask the audience? Nope, already done that. Decided to ignore their answer.
              Ask the audience, then it's back to Craig, Darcy, Bruno & Len.

              This thread has proved that many members of the audience don't understand British laws and British democracy, but instead want to impose a state where British law is not allowed to be applied.
              …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by WTFH View Post
                Ask the audience, then it's back to Craig, Darcy, Bruno & Len.

                This thread has proved that many members of the audience don't understand British laws and British democracy, but instead want to impose a state where British law is not allowed to be applied.
                Well the referendum which took place when we went in (or technically just after) was taken as binding enough, what about this one?
                His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by WTFH View Post
                  Ask the audience, then it's back to Craig, Darcy, Bruno & Len.

                  This thread has proved that many members of the audience don't understand British laws and British democracy, but instead want to impose a state where British law is not allowed to be applied.
                  I don't think it's defined that well hence the court cases. British law working against the people suggests the law is in difficulty and will eventually be overturned.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                    Hiding in my Swiss nuclear bunker.
                    and take anyone's money regardless of where it came from? Oh you are going native.

                    Check the gold Bars for swastikas !
                    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by GB9 View Post
                      I don't think it's defined that well hence the court cases. British law working against the people suggests the law is in difficulty and will eventually be overturned.
                      You're the one who took the Strictly analogy forward and then stopped, I'm just pointing out you missed the last step.

                      ...as for British law working against British people, well that's just your twisted view of how you want the law to be avoided when it suits you.
                      A 3% majority of the British people voted to leave the EU, it's now up to parliament to debate that vote and decide the outcome, because that's the way British law and British democracy works.
                      If you don't like British law, British democracy and British sovereignty I'm beginning to think you're actually a remoaner who is just trolling...
                      …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X