I went through the forum looking for an answer to my conundrum and only found a post from 2008.
My wife is PAYE and I jump between Inside IR35 and Outside. We have to girls and since we are still working from home, we want to employ a nanny rather than drop them off somewhere where they will probably get sick half the time. The cost for 2 kids in childcare is the same as having a nanny anyhow.
My experience is that the government really doesn't want mums going back to work. If you employ a nanny directly, you become an employer but then pay tax on the salary you have already paid tax on (employer contribution, tax for nanny, pension, insurance etc). This is a cost you can't even deduct from your tax liability, which you can in other countries. So in the end her whole salary will go to pay the nanny, and I might need to chip in too.
Can I setup a new company and employ the nanny from that and deduct it from my LTD? Or run it as a "Creche" which was mentioned in that ooooold post? I am thinking that it might be better not employing the nanny directly in my my LTD just in case but anything is better than the double tax imposed.
I've talked to my accountant and he said there isn't any other way.
I really can't get my head around it, you become so vulnerable, even dismissing your nanny might see you with an unfair dismissal. I would think that the government would be happy if you employed someone and at least not force you pay employer contribution... which is my main issue. The Taxman is going to take a bigger chunk out of my salary than I will since the source (my salary) will be taxed for me, then the nanny will be taxed again and I also have to pay employer contribution.
Surely the people that can afford paying £40k for a nanny are not paying all this nonsense tax.
The only alternative I can see is the missus not working or taking a work break and getting paid from the LTD which doesn't benefit anyone, since her career break is most likely going to make her unemployable in the future. Or employing someone self employed as and "office manager" on the company on a extendable 3 - 6 months contract. I would mention cash in hand too, but that is just as bad, plus all the cash in hand "nannies" (more like glorifies babysitters that came after Brexit and waiting on right of work) we talked to want the same as the fully employed ones))
If you have any suggesting please let me have it.
My wife is PAYE and I jump between Inside IR35 and Outside. We have to girls and since we are still working from home, we want to employ a nanny rather than drop them off somewhere where they will probably get sick half the time. The cost for 2 kids in childcare is the same as having a nanny anyhow.
My experience is that the government really doesn't want mums going back to work. If you employ a nanny directly, you become an employer but then pay tax on the salary you have already paid tax on (employer contribution, tax for nanny, pension, insurance etc). This is a cost you can't even deduct from your tax liability, which you can in other countries. So in the end her whole salary will go to pay the nanny, and I might need to chip in too.
Can I setup a new company and employ the nanny from that and deduct it from my LTD? Or run it as a "Creche" which was mentioned in that ooooold post? I am thinking that it might be better not employing the nanny directly in my my LTD just in case but anything is better than the double tax imposed.
I've talked to my accountant and he said there isn't any other way.
I really can't get my head around it, you become so vulnerable, even dismissing your nanny might see you with an unfair dismissal. I would think that the government would be happy if you employed someone and at least not force you pay employer contribution... which is my main issue. The Taxman is going to take a bigger chunk out of my salary than I will since the source (my salary) will be taxed for me, then the nanny will be taxed again and I also have to pay employer contribution.
Surely the people that can afford paying £40k for a nanny are not paying all this nonsense tax.
The only alternative I can see is the missus not working or taking a work break and getting paid from the LTD which doesn't benefit anyone, since her career break is most likely going to make her unemployable in the future. Or employing someone self employed as and "office manager" on the company on a extendable 3 - 6 months contract. I would mention cash in hand too, but that is just as bad, plus all the cash in hand "nannies" (more like glorifies babysitters that came after Brexit and waiting on right of work) we talked to want the same as the fully employed ones))
If you have any suggesting please let me have it.
Comment