Originally posted by elpinar
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by elpinar View Postif you read the sign up instructions it tells you when you will be given conifrmation of what ....Comment
-
Originally posted by elpinar View Posti think if there is surplus cash the first 15k should be set aside and used to send DR and santa on a nice holiday
Let's not forget all the hard work going on behind the scenes from our chairman and the rest of the Steering Group.
We all have our individual strengths - it really is a great team behind this operation.'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
-
Originally posted by elpinar View Posti think if there is surplus cash the first 15k should be set aside and used to send DR and santa on a nice holidayComment
-
can anyone tell me the difference between years suspended on appeal and a year where ' the enquiry for that year is still open ? '
Are we meant to have any of the latter ?
my latest year 07/08 seems to be in that stateComment
-
Originally posted by ns1 View PostI was in the MP scheme but am not currently a member of NTRT.
Isn't it the case that it doesn't matter which appeal wins (Huitson, Shiner or NTRT) because everyone in the scheme will benefit from the precedent anyway?
£1200 is quite a lot of money to fork out if it's not necessary.Comment
-
Originally posted by Morlock View PostI disagree. I think we should reimburse George for the part of his tax demand that he had to stump up.Comment
-
Originally posted by Morlock View PostI disagree. I think we should reimburse George for the part of his tax demand that he had to stump up.Comment
-
What ever the Steering Goup thinks best.
Originally posted by SantaClaus View PostLOL, I'll graciously refuse.
Let's not forget all the hard work going on behind the scenes from our chairman and the rest of the Steering Group.
We all have our individual strengths - it really is a great team behind this operation.Comment
-
Correction
Originally posted by ringodingo View PostI would lke to say that for my share of any surplus I will be more tan happy to let the Steeing Group decide how best to use the surplus.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
Comment