Section 9A TMA 1970 Enquiry validity
I think the deadline for opening an enquiry is:
30th Jan 2008 for 05/06
30th Jan 2009 for 06/07
etc
it actually says that in one of the Freedom of info sheets they sent me a couple of years back when I asked -the dealines and checkboxes were listed.
I think that if the Section 9A TMA 1970 reference was not required then they wouldn't have bothered putting it on all the subsequent ones I got and they wouldn't bother to doctor (if that is what has happened) the "copies" that they have sent to other people on this forum to add it in. Interestingly they did not doctor the copy they sent me a while back as previously mentioned.
Sounds like if an agent has complied and given info off the back of the 19A TMA 1970 Info request (mine was also May 2008 for 05/06) then they may be open to a PI claim as the request for info may not have been valid - I would be more inclined to argue that the subsequent Closure Notice under 28A TMA 1970 was invalid due to the lack of 9A Enquiry personally. Seems more fair to go after the "real" villains here. Maybe that will be indeed be possible - I've sent scans to MP of my queried enquiry. Fingers crossed as 35% of my numbers would go away if that were the case.
Originally posted by orientalist
View Post
I think the deadline for opening an enquiry is:
30th Jan 2008 for 05/06
30th Jan 2009 for 06/07
etc
it actually says that in one of the Freedom of info sheets they sent me a couple of years back when I asked -the dealines and checkboxes were listed.
I think that if the Section 9A TMA 1970 reference was not required then they wouldn't have bothered putting it on all the subsequent ones I got and they wouldn't bother to doctor (if that is what has happened) the "copies" that they have sent to other people on this forum to add it in. Interestingly they did not doctor the copy they sent me a while back as previously mentioned.
Sounds like if an agent has complied and given info off the back of the 19A TMA 1970 Info request (mine was also May 2008 for 05/06) then they may be open to a PI claim as the request for info may not have been valid - I would be more inclined to argue that the subsequent Closure Notice under 28A TMA 1970 was invalid due to the lack of 9A Enquiry personally. Seems more fair to go after the "real" villains here. Maybe that will be indeed be possible - I've sent scans to MP of my queried enquiry. Fingers crossed as 35% of my numbers would go away if that were the case.
Comment