Originally posted by Pondlife
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
What is everyone going to do assuming HMR&C and Osborne get their way?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
No, hence "intermediary reporting requirement". If a PSC is working direct, there is no reporting requirement, although the PSC may have a reporting requirement on a subcontractor (i.e. where the PSC is an intermediary).Originally posted by jmo21 View Postand if direct, are end clients already doing this?Comment
-
Similar here perhaps.Originally posted by d000hg View PostI don't bring in anything like £100k to begin with, in order that I could require it! I could just get a bog standard 30k coding job if worst came to worst, and I deliberately don't allow myself to forget that my contracting income is a massive luxury.
I used to make £100k in the good old days, now the margin over what I'd get permie is much reduced, but the sting in the tail is that few employers want a permie in their 50s who's been on the tools designing stuff and avoided all leadership/management nonsense as a freelancer for 20 years.Comment
-
There's no long term money in IT, you have 20 years to coin it in as a techie, 20 to 40 years old. In your 40's you need either to be well into plan b, or taken the permie management pill, where £100K p.a. is a common as muck. I know managers on twice that with bonuses.Originally posted by Lightwave View PostSimilar here perhaps.
I used to make £100k in the good old days, now the margin over what I'd get permie is much reduced, but the sting in the tail is that few employers want a permie in their 50s who's been on the tools designing stuff and avoided all leadership/management nonsense as a freelancer for 20 years.Comment
-
Nope.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostThere's no long term money in IT, you have 20 years to coin it in as a techie, 20 to 40 years old. In your 40's you need either to be well into plan b, or taken the permie management pill, where £100K p.a. is a common as muck. I know managers on twice that with bonuses.
Wrong side of 45 now and turnover is double that. The "M" word appears nowhere on my CV.
It depends what you do and how you do it. Move with the times and stay up to date, and there is plenty of money to be made."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Originally posted by jmo21 View Postand if direct, are end clients already doing this?WJBSOriginally posted by jamesbrown View PostNo, hence "intermediary reporting requirement". If a PSC is working direct, there is no reporting requirement, although the PSC may have a reporting requirement on a subcontractor (i.e. where the PSC is an intermediary).
More on it at http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...uirements.htmlComment
-
And where?Originally posted by DaveB View PostNope.
Wrong side of 45 now and turnover is double that. The "M" word appears nowhere on my CV.
It depends what you do and how you do it. Move with the times and stay up to date, and there is plenty of money to be made.
Once I had enough cash to enjoy life I became less willing to chase around the country (etc) for a bit more.Comment
-
Ben Dover Productions company name is already taken...Originally posted by LucidDementia View PostEvolve my business model.Comment
-
Why would they keep ER? It would allow people pay 18% corp tax (when it arrives) and then 10% CGT on remaining amount by claming ER - effective taxation of 26% instead of PAYE which can reach 60% (45% income tax + 2% employee NIC + 13.8% employer NIC).Originally posted by alphadog View PostBut if they bring in a rock solid 1 month limit and eliminate entrepreneurs relief, then it's DOOM DOOM DOOM!
Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostWhy would they keep ER? It would allow people pay 18% corp tax (when it arrives) and then 10% CGT on remaining amount by claming ER - effective taxation of 26% instead of PAYE which can reach 60% (45% income tax + 2% employee NIC + 13.8% employer NIC).
The fact all we now have is an entrepreneurial economy would suggest keeping it is a good idea, but it seems Osborne's only wish is to bankrupt the UK as fast as possible so my statement is invalid.I'm a smug bastard.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment