Reply to: Who's been banned and why? Your right to reply.

[NotAllThere]

I'm 99% sure Nat managed to do this before....

Yeah, but that time it was deliberate.

[sadkingbilly]

I'm 99% sure Nat managed to do this before....

more than once, too

[eek]

Nat banned himself? Maybe doing a zeitghost.

I'm 99% sure Nat managed to do this before....

[NotAllThere]

Nat banned himself? Maybe doing a zeitghost.

Nah - he'd never do something that stupid accidentally.

What I think happened is that instead of selecting a spammers post and deleting it, I selected the whole thread and deleted it, and I was the one who started it...

[NotAllThere]

so the bannee has NO right to respond.

If it's just a temporary ban, then they do.

[xoggoth]

Nat banned himself? Maybe doing a zeitghost.

[malvolio]

only to you.
and you can 'be clear' all you feckin like, you'll never get it.

[sadkingbilly]

How about answering the question? The post I quoted implied that bannees should have a right to reply.

Anyway I am clear now. You didn't mean what I thought, and I am also clear that you have no idea what you mean, you're just making more pointless posts.

only to you.
and you can 'be clear' all you feckin like, you'll never get it.

[malvolio]

Another argument. Escellento! Where's the stab stab smiley?

I'm not arguing. Utterly pointless exercise.

[xoggoth]

Another argument. Escellento! Where's the stab stab smiley?

[malvolio]

I didn't say that, so you're not clear (as usual)

How about answering the question? The post I quoted implied that bannees should have a right to reply.

Anyway I am clear now. You didn't mean what I thought, and I am also clear that you have no idea what you mean, you're just making more pointless posts.

[sadkingbilly]

Just so I'm clear, are you saying someone that's been banned for breaking rules badly enough to be thrown off permanently should be allowed to protest through the forums...?

I didn't say that, so you're not clear (as usual)

[xoggoth]

Take the knee for Vetran!!!

[malvolio]

anyone who's NOT banned.
so the bannee has NO right to respond.

Just so I'm clear, are you saying someone that's been banned for breaking rules badly enough to be thrown off permanently should be allowed to protest through the forums...?

[sadkingbilly]

Yes. And you failed.

Not all bans are permanent. And anyway, replies are switched off on "Who has been banned and why", and this thread is the right of anyone, not just the bannee, to respond.

anyone who's NOT banned.
so the bannee has NO right to respond.