• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Sir Kier Starmer and the rumours..."

Collapse

  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by escapeUK View Post

    Has anyone else noticed the Labourmost voters are so have such a low IQ they never try and argue a point, or prove someone wrong. The height of their arguing skills is making some childish comment about a user name
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by SussexSeagull View Post
    I do wish that people who go to the time and effort to make up nonsense about the Prime Minister learnt to spell his first name correctly.
    If you wish really, really hard it may just happen. Close your eyes really tight, wish and step forward into the oncoming traffic. Problem solved.

    Leave a comment:


  • SussexSeagull
    replied
    I do wish that people who go to the time and effort to make up nonsense about the Prime Minister learnt to spell his first name correctly.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by escapeUK View Post

    why don't you leave if you don't like it?

    I'll be honest with you, why would I leave when the best bit is just around the corner?
    OK then. - don't leave.
    JUST STOP WHINGEING!!!
    FFS.

    Leave a comment:


  • escapeUK
    replied
    Originally posted by DoctorStrangelove View Post
    Why is this twat still in this country? Can't find the escape module?

    Will someone show it to it FFS.

    Talk about inverse nominative determinism.
    Has anyone else noticed the Labour voters are so low IQ they never try and argue a point, or prove someone wrong. The height of their arguing skills is making some childish comment about a user name, or say why don't you leave if you don't like it?

    I'll be honest with you, why would I leave when the best bit is just around the corner?
    Last edited by escapeUK; 13 October 2024, 13:40.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    The current Political landscape

    Click image for larger version

Name:	72881-0b2c4f53-b609-4172-953c-8a45051d8267.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	55.1 KB
ID:	4297712




    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Why is this twat still in this country? Can't find the escape module?

    Will someone show it to it FFS.

    Talk about inverse nominative determinism.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by escapeUK View Post
    A delicious bit of news in the Telegraph today. Rachel Reeves the Chancellor of the occupational government, expensed £1225 to pay someone to help her file her tax return. Of course you and I would not be able to deduct such an expense from our personal tax return, oh no, that's only for more equal animals than us.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/ta...p-tax-returns/

    Also, if she thinks she is clever enough to be Chancellor, then why exactly does she need help? Hilarious. Also MPs have a dedicated fast track helpline, no waiting in a queue hours for HRMC to answer and then give the wrong answer!

    Oh and for those saying what have Labour done in their first 100 days, someone made a nice list It already seems out of date as it misses the 1 billion investment cancelled from DP world / PO Ferries.
    To be fair, the P&O thing is back on but still a major cock up by a minister.

    The real test will be how well Starmer and Lammy handle the upcoming Commonwealth conference...

    Leave a comment:


  • escapeUK
    replied
    A delicious bit of news in the Telegraph today. Rachel Reeves the Chancellor of the occupational government, expensed £1225 to pay someone to help her file her tax return. Of course you and I would not be able to deduct such an expense from our personal tax return, oh no, that's only for more equal animals than us.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/ta...p-tax-returns/

    Also, if she thinks she is clever enough to be Chancellor, then why exactly does she need help? Hilarious. Also MPs have a dedicated fast track helpline, no waiting in a queue hours for HRMC to answer and then give the wrong answer!

    Oh and for those saying what have Labour done in their first 100 days, someone made a nice list It already seems out of date as it misses the 1 billion investment cancelled from DP world / PO Ferries.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	GZrJErrXMAIoWXg?format=jpg&name=900x900.jpg Views:	0 Size:	168.4 KB ID:	4297707
    Last edited by escapeUK; 13 October 2024, 10:31.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post

    It would appear that No.10 have had to step in and dig our clueless PM out of his hole... https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...rpedoed-claims
    It will be just the Labour party that is torpedoed then? Sometimes Count Binface looks a good choice!

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Snooky View Post
    Wibble widdle widdle
    You can't alternate each sentence with "after 14 years of Tory misrule" and do SFA about water, its a massive open goal left by the tory morons.

    Not so much dealing with my points but letting your nappy over run on it.

    All they needed to do was to enforce/improve governance laws.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by TheDude View Post

    He's a lawyer, not a munitions expert.
    It would appear that No.10 have had to step in and dig our clueless PM out of his hole... https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...rpedoed-claims

    Leave a comment:


  • Snooky
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    No water companies being ripped a new one.
    I CBA to respond to all your drivel, but this particular one caught my eye as it's been in the news lately:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5ypp032le0o

    Thames Water, Yorkshire Water and Northumbrian Water face £168m fines by the industry regulator over historic sewage spills
    ...
    The government is currently consulting on plans to ensure that money earmarked for upgrades cannot be used to pay salaries or dividends.


    The Conservatives watched this get worse and worse during their tenure but did SFA about it.

    I'm sure most of your other points are easily dismantled but I really don't have the patience.

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post

    Things are normally revealed - eventually.

    I could've equally ended the post with "Confused? You won't be after this week's episode of Soap!" - but only those of a sufficiently long enough memory would've understood that one.
    You git.

    Now I'll be whistling that theme tune all afternoon.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post

    Maybe Starmer doesn't have a clue about what he's saying.
    He's a lawyer, not a munitions expert.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X