• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Didn't take long

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Didn't take long"

Collapse

  • Zigenare
    replied
    House groups of young men on disused military bases while they await the clarion call - now that sounds like a cunning plan...

    Time to stock up on beans and shotgun shells...

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied



    Priti Nasty isn't happy with Cruella Braverman

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...essex-raf-base

    The former home secretary Priti Patel has accused the government of being “secretive” and “evasive” about plans to house asylum seekers on a disused RAF base which has become the target of protests and legal challenges.

    She demanded answers from Suella Bravermen, the current home secretary, in a letter, saying there was an “alarming and staggering” lack of clarity about how long the site would be used for and how many people would be accommodated there.

    The site at RAF Wethersfield in Essex is one of a number of military bases that have been earmarked, along with the Bibby Stockholm barge, to house asylum seekers in an attempt to reduce costs of hotel accommodation.

    However, the plans have been opposed by local residents and human rights and refugee campaigners who have told the Home Office it is cruel to hold asylum seekers in conditions of “quasi-detention” in remote areas far from communities and support networks. Braintree district council has brought legal action to challenge the use of the airfield to house up to 1,700 men.


    Patel tweeted a copy of her letter – addressed to Braverman and the immigration minister Robert Jenrick – in which she complained of getting “no definitive answers” to questions posed in correspondence and in parliament about the timeframe for the site.

    She said it had been drawn to her attention over the weekend that the government was planning to use the site for years.

    The Telegraph reported on internal Home Office documents outlining that the government was planning to use disused RAF bases including Wethersfield to house migrants for between three and five years, or longer.

    “The lack of a direct response to my questions relating to the length of time the Home Office plans to use the site for asylum accommodation gives the impression that the Home Office is being evasive,” said Patel, whose Witham constituency is close to Wethersfield.

    She added that local partners had asked the same questions but communications from the government had been “ineffective” and the latest version of a Home Office factsheet on Wethersfield referred to the issue only as “temporary” and that it would be kept under review.

    “This suggests that the government is being secretive about its intentions, but the local community and partners need to know what the government’s plans are,” said Patel. While a temporary “Class Q” designation for the site was for a 12-month period, she said that reports at the weekend indicated it would be used for much longer.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    the French see themselves as separate (and hence superior) to everyone they meet who aren't French
    And the Parisians view themselves as separate from the French!





    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by GregRickshaw View Post

    No it's a ism all right, the human race needs help.. this is our land, home-grown, the rules.... jeez such awful statements.... not sure what you'd call it maybe humanism, but it's not based on race what we are doing to these people is all too typical of the human race, and if you knew me which you never will, you would realise I have suffered and lived my entire life being racially abused.
    We are not a country of limitless resources - we don't have the spare capacity in employment, housing, healthcare and education to look after our current population never mind an uncontrolled influx of illegal migrants.

    If you are trying to enter the country illegally, what else are you hiding?

    On a side note, who are these young men going to pair up with in the fullness of time? Do we have a surplus of young females in the UK?

    Leave a comment:


  • JustKeepSwimming
    replied
    Originally posted by GregRickshaw View Post

    No it's a ism all right, the human race needs help.. this is our land, home-grown, the rules.... jeez such awful statements.... not sure what you'd call it maybe humanism, but it's not based on race what we are doing to these people is all too typical of the human race, and if you knew me which you never will, you would realise I have suffered and lived my entire life being racially abused.
    Such a bigoted and arrogant worldview.

    Leave a comment:


  • GregRickshaw
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    oh my god people decide not to abide by the rules, people rightly take exception and you decide that is racism - you are the one that needs help
    No it's a ism all right, the human race needs help.. this is our land, home-grown, the rules.... jeez such awful statements.... not sure what you'd call it maybe humanism, but it's not based on race what we are doing to these people is all too typical of the human race, and if you knew me which you never will, you would realise I have suffered and lived my entire life being racially abused.
    Last edited by GregRickshaw; 12 August 2023, 19:38.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by GregRickshaw View Post

    The sooner the world stops labelling people by skin, religion, country, ethnicity and we realise we are all the human race and no one but mother nature owns any part of the world the better.

    Humans treat humans so badly and none of it makes any sense as to why.
    oh my god people decide not to abide by the rules, people rightly take exception and you decide that is racism - you are the one that needs help

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    With 7.88 billion & rising, you ain't seen nothing yet.

    The Resource Wars are coming.

    That should cull the population a bit.

    Then again on the Swiss thing: KJV Matthew 7:5 springs to mind.

    Leave a comment:


  • GregRickshaw
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    What bit of "Put yourself in harm's way" don't you understand?

    Also, and more importantly, it is not one group of people. There are genuine asylum seekers, legal economic immigrants, genuine refugees and illegals. It's only the latter group that are liable to harsh treatment, on the basis that we can't afford them, they aren't adding to the economy (quite the opposite in fact) and they have already left a safe haven to come here.

    Their motivation is quite simple as well. They have been told that if they get here we will give them money and work, free houses and free medical care. So let's ignore our home-grown people in need and favour the illegal ones...
    The sooner the world stops labelling people by skin, religion, country, ethnicity and we realise we are all the human race and no one but mother nature owns any part of the world the better.

    Humans treat humans so badly and none of it makes any sense as to why.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I think the migrants are being had!

    Oh, they can't be sent back to Calais. Shame the Dublin Agreement hasn't been renegotiated.
    indeed, sadly we can't send them back to Albania either.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post

    Switzerland's immigration policies - which include “one of the longest and strictest residency requirements in Europe” - “encourage the public to see immigrants as foreigners and not fully as equals and neighbours," according to the study by the EU-sponsored Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX).
    It's a cultural thing, embedded in the language. For example, we have words for "Stranger" and "Guest". The Greek "Xenos" means both "Stranger" and "Guest". The French "Étranger" means both "Stranger" and "Foreigner". Arabic has separate words for "Guest who is a stranger" and "Guest who is a Friend"

    So we have separate concepts, the Greeks treat everyone as a guest, the French see themselves as separate (and hence superior) to everyone they meet who aren't French and the Arabs, being a pragmatic people, allow for a change of status.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I think the migrants are being had!

    Oh, they can't be sent back to Calais. Shame the Dublin Agreement hasn't been renegotiated.
    Switzerland's immigration policies - which include “one of the longest and strictest residency requirements in Europe” - “encourage the public to see immigrants as foreigners and not fully as equals and neighbours," according to the study by the EU-sponsored Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX).

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Do you not think we are being had?
    I think the migrants are being had!

    Oh, they can't be sent back to Calais. Shame the Dublin Agreement hasn't been renegotiated.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by GregRickshaw View Post
    What a world we live in where we treat humans this way...
    most sensible countries lock criminals up.

    Try pushing through the passport and evade the immigration officers line in any civilised country and see what happens. That is what they intend to do.

    Try - What a world we live in that people think they can behave this way in a civilised country.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by GregRickshaw View Post
    What a world we live in where we treat humans this way...
    What bit of "Put yourself in harm's way" don't you understand?

    Also, and more importantly, it is not one group of people. There are genuine asylum seekers, legal economic immigrants, genuine refugees and illegals. It's only the latter group that are liable to harsh treatment, on the basis that we can't afford them, they aren't adding to the economy (quite the opposite in fact) and they have already left a safe haven to come here.

    Their motivation is quite simple as well. They have been told that if they get here we will give them money and work, free houses and free medical care. So let's ignore our home-grown people in need and favour the illegal ones...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X