• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "P&O Ferries (Again)"

Collapse

  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    so all these international underpaid seamen joined the RMT who protected them in the way they couldn't protect their UK members?
    The RMT are a law unto themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    The Fail are so anti-union they couldn't simply say this

    BBC News - P&O forced to reverse attempt at pay cut
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-61209894

    It comes after the RMT Union received reports of agency workers at Dover being asked to sign contracts replacing their old ones with reduced payment.

    The union reported P&O to the Maritime and Coastguard Agency, which ensured the new workers retained their original wages.
    so all these international underpaid seamen joined the RMT who protected them in the way they couldn't protect their UK members?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    The Fail are so anti-union they couldn't simply say this

    BBC News - P&O forced to reverse attempt at pay cut
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-61209894

    It comes after the RMT Union received reports of agency workers at Dover being asked to sign contracts replacing their old ones with reduced payment.

    The union reported P&O to the Maritime and Coastguard Agency, which ensured the new workers retained their original wages.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    you can't keep a good cost cutter down!

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ign-staff.html
    FFS - seriously they need to be avoided by all those who have a choice.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    you can't keep a good cost cutter down!

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ign-staff.html

    P&O Ferries 'tries to CUT wages of its new low-paid foreign staff': Dubai-based firm sparks fresh fury by 'asking agency recruits to sign new contacts on reduced wages' after 'illegally' sacking 800 UK workers over Zoom
    • P&O Ferries are accused of trying to pay new agency workers even less money
    • The ferry company fired nearly 800 employees and replaced them immediately
    • Some new workers have been offered contracts on even lower pay, it is claimed

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    They are starting to be allowed to sail.

    BBC News - P&O Ferries: First Dover to Calais ferry cleared to sail https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-61197464

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    And the news continues
    https://www.theguardian.com/business...ety-inspection

    Maritime inspectors listed an unprecedented 31 separate failings on a P&O Ferries vessel detained last month, ranging from problems with fire safety to lifeboat drills.

    Inspectors for the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) refused to allow the European Causeway to keep sailing from Larne, Northern Ireland, after discovering issues with labour conditions, navigation and documentation.

    Emerging details of the inspections show the MCA has flung the book at the ferry operator, which provoked outcry when it sacked 800 crew to replace them with cheap agency staff in March.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post

    they will stop naming ships "Pride of "
    well as most of them are "pride of" towns / regions abroad it won't be too upsetting

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._Ferries_ships

    I much prefer "Fury" & "Beagle" anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    If you tolerate this...
    they will stop naming ships "Pride of <insert place in UK>"

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NigelJK View Post
    Yeah far better to lose all the jobs, on and off shore, than to let them run their company.
    If you tolerate this...

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    Yeah far better to lose all the jobs, on and off shore, than to let them run their company.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Another ship, the Spirit of Britain, has been detained....
    Kind of ironic with all this going on no? Surprised it didn't sink.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post

    It's not about trust, but about volume of traffic and cost.
    If DFDS are struggling to cope with all their own customers, then they will now want to take on others.
    eek hit the nail on the head. also few people would actively invest in P&O with the government gunning for them.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    it was a reciprocal arrangement as I understand kit, if DFDS had too many passengers -> P&O and vice versa.

    but I suspect the trust is gone.
    It's not about trust, but about volume of traffic and cost.
    If DFDS are struggling to cope with all their own customers, then they will now want to take on others.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    it was a reciprocal arrangement as I understand kit, if DFDS had too many passengers -> P&O and vice versa.

    but I suspect the trust is gone.
    Quid pro quo works for a couple of days if you are down a ship. It doesn't work when your entire fleet is unable to sail.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X