Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Whatsup WhatsApp
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Whatsup WhatsApp"
Collapse
-
I think realistically if he had photoshopped them, BJ would have kicked up a fuss about it by nowOriginally posted by d000hg View Post
Ultimately it doesn't matter how secure the messenger tool is, if the other person wants to spill the beans. Now, how we know D.C. didn't photoshop his screenshots or whatever I'm not sure?
It's pretty shady for DC to be sharing personal messages with the prime minister with the national press though - what a rat
Leave a comment:
-
Ultimately it doesn't matter how secure the messenger tool is, if the other person wants to spill the beans. Now, how we know D.C. didn't photoshop his screenshots or whatever I'm not sure?Originally posted by agentzero View PostMost people in high ranking roles that I know use Signal messenger, which looks to be much more secure than WhatsApp and doesn't leave metadata trails.
Leave a comment:
-
Most people in high ranking roles that I know use Signal messenger, which looks to be much more secure than WhatsApp and doesn't leave metadata trails.
Leave a comment:
-
DefinitelyOriginally posted by d000hg View PostAnd emails presumably. Not to mention letters and phones.
They should meet in a windy field with a paper bag over their heads.
Oh wait a minute I think MP's already do that but for a different reason
Leave a comment:
-
These days you have to assume anything you send electronically can be found, if it's worth someone's time to do so. However many MPs are not technologically astute.Originally posted by mallisarealperson View PostWould you put in writing you thought a colleague was f***ing hopeless. So that someone like Dominic Cummings could publish it later.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57498845
And surely conversations with the PM would be classed as restricted?? So is Dom in a lot of trouble.
In terms of things being restricted, well technically you might be doing something wrong but leaking this sort of stuff always seems popular
Leave a comment:
-
Never liked Dominic Cummings however I like the fact he took screen shots of the conversations.
Always cover yourself.
If I was involved in government I would ban all mp's from using any social media/messing apps.
Especially WhatsApp.
There MP's not celebs FFS.
Leave a comment:
-
AFAIK WhatsApp is not a sanctioned HMG comms product. It appears they were using it in an at least notional personal capacity, probably to maintain deniability by removing it from the scope of FOI requests as the civil servants dealing with them would not be aware and so would not include them in a response.
At the time it probably didn't cross Johnsons mind that it could be played back against him. Dom, I suspect, was a bit more switched on.
Now, if any of those involved ever denied that they conducted official discussions on the platform as an excuse to avoid turning over message histories, that's just been blown out of the water as we now they they did.
Leave a comment:
-
The government has screwed up using WhatsApp anyway...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-56570650.amp
https://www.politico.eu/article/bori...t-by-whatsapp/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b1851783.html
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...eting-messages
Leave a comment:
-
I have written far worse in WhatsApp messages and emails.
I don't mind if they are published
As for messages being restricted. They were not using an internal government system but personal accounts so the restriction bit is a little iffy I think. Leaking an email from .gov.uk would be different so I am led to believe. I don't believe Boris' Tinder or Grindr profiles are restricted? Or maybe they are? because he married Princess Nutcase as the downing street press corps like to call her and not a transvestite alsatian. Well she looks like a woman.
Leave a comment:
-
Whatsup WhatsApp
Would you put in writing you thought a colleague was f***ing hopeless. So that someone like Dominic Cummings could publish it later.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57498845
And surely conversations with the PM would be classed as restricted?? So is Dom in a lot of trouble.
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: