• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Agents not revealing the name of the client"

Collapse

  • NigelJK
    replied
    The operative word is 'Defining'. I would take that to mean the first that uses the method used by all other since. The prize goes to :
    Matthew K. Gray produces the first known web robot, the Perl-based World Wide Web Wanderer, and uses it to generate an index of the web called the Wandex.[5][6][7] However, the World Wide Web Wanderer is intended only to measure the size of the web rather than to facilitate search.

    Blame Google for the rise and rise of the dominant Marketing dept. Based on Google analytics.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    To be fair, I was willing to let that one pass...

    you are no fun

    ooh i came over all assgoo...

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    you have mates
    To be fair, I was willing to let that one pass...

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post
    I did some work for AOL back in mid 2000's .... I'll give some of my old mates a call and see if they're still hiring. I might be able to get you a nice CD of their software too, if you're lucky
    you have mates

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by greenlake View Post
    Nah, he already found someone to work for peanuts....literally....

    You never let us down...

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    It definitely AtW looking for someone to run his CUK acct so he doesn't get banned so frequently.

    Where do I sign up?
    Nah, he already found someone to work for peanuts....literally....

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by edison View Post
    I'm aware of DuckDuckGo but it's a bit of a stretch to call it an 'international tech business famous for its defining search engine.'

    I'm not aware they make any other products either. It is surely Google.

    DuckDuckGo only has a few dozen employees and nearly all in the USA.

    The role was for an office temp paying £14-17 an hour if anyone is interested...
    It definitely AtW looking for someone to run his CUK acct so he doesn't get banned so frequently.

    Where do I sign up?

    Leave a comment:


  • edison
    replied
    Originally posted by GJABS View Post
    Maybe it is duckduckgo.com, a search engine whose selling point is providing their users with anonymity. And they are being so to you.
    I'm aware of DuckDuckGo but it's a bit of a stretch to call it an 'international tech business famous for its defining search engine.'

    I'm not aware they make any other products either. It is surely Google.

    DuckDuckGo only has a few dozen employees and nearly all in the USA.

    The role was for an office temp paying £14-17 an hour if anyone is interested...

    Leave a comment:


  • GJABS
    replied
    Maybe it is duckduckgo.com, a search engine whose selling point is providing their users with anonymity. And they are being so to you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by edison View Post
    We can argue whether it's pointless for an agent not to reveal the name of the client until after having had a first discussion/seen your CV etc.

    But I wonder what this agent was thinking of - who could the client possibly be?!?

    "My Client, an international tech business famous for its defining search engine along with other tech products"

    I did some work for AOL back in mid 2000's .... I'll give some of my old mates a call and see if they're still hiring. I might be able to get you a nice CD of their software too, if you're lucky

    Leave a comment:


  • krytonsheep
    replied
    Lycos ??
    Got to be Altavista

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by edison View Post
    We can argue whether it's pointless for an agent not to reveal the name of the client until after having had a first discussion/seen your CV etc.

    But I wonder what this agent was thinking of - who could the client possibly be?!?

    "My Client, an international tech business famous for its defining search engine along with other tech products"

    SKA?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Moved.
    thanks.... I have nothing to add though...
    I'll think of something after a glass (bottle) of Barbera d'Asti.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Moved.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    /thread
    never should have started. Well not outside general anyways.

    @Mods ????

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X