• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Would you stop contracting if Plan B paid off?"

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by TheDude View Post

    Your best bet is retro style games.

    One man development studios died with the Spectrum and Commodore 64.
    Not quite that long ago but certainly for today. There was a resurgence in 1-man teams the early days of mobile gaming but now you phone can run Crysis everyone expects modern phone games to be as polished as other platforms.

    You just need to come up with one of these viral puzzle games or the next Wordle

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Lots of them started at university/college. Many have gone bankrupt at least once. The thing about software is you don't (didn't) need a lot of money to create something. You could literally do it on your PC coding all night.
    Your best bet is retro style games.

    One man development studios died with the Spectrum and Commodore 64.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by achilles View Post

    That's what £100K of passive income would do for you, it would free you up to start your own gaming business. I bet this is what happened with the majority of billionaire entrepreneurs who claim that they started from nothing, but in reality they either had rich daddies or strong passive income.
    Lots of them started at university/college. Many have gone bankrupt at least once. The thing about software is you don't (didn't) need a lot of money to create something. You could literally do it on your PC coding all night.

    Leave a comment:


  • achilles
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post

    I've been a wannabe entrepreneur and even put quite a bit of time into it but ultimately I discovered I didn't really have the balls to commit 100% and that's the only way to make it work. In my younger days I was desperate to my my own PC games, and I still like the idea but only for fun not profit. I'd like to try my hand at writing but only if I didn't need the money!
    That's what £100K of passive income would do for you, it would free you up to start your own gaming business. I bet this is what happened with the majority of billionaire entrepreneurs who claim that they started from nothing, but in reality they either had rich daddies or strong passive income.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by hobnob View Post

    A compromise would be to work through an umbrella rather than running your own limited company. That way you'd avoid politics, appraisals, etc. but you'd also be able to take gaps between contracts and only work when you get bored or want a bit of extra cash (assuming that your "plan B" covers your routine expenses).
    Mmm have you missed the threads on people being forced to work through specific umbrella companies? That's politics right there.

    The only way to avoid politics is do a job which has no human interaction.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    If I had a guaranteed income that required little or no maintenance on my part then, being about as driven as a wet lettuce, I'd get a little part-time job that would keep the brain cells from dying off but I wouldn't go about setting up companies and trying to be the next Branson (or whoever).

    Some people are not born to be serial entrepreneurs we just like to turn up, get paid, go home.
    I've been a wannabe entrepreneur and even put quite a bit of time into it but ultimately I discovered I didn't really have the balls to commit 100% and that's the only way to make it work. In my younger days I was desperate to my my own PC games, and I still like the idea but only for fun not profit. I'd like to try my hand at writing but only if I didn't need the money!

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by achilles View Post

    Why would you not start your own business instead where you would not have a boss and no politics?
    No politics? You've never run a business with employees have you?
    If you think the 9-5 is draining, try running your own business!

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    If I had a guaranteed income that required little or no maintenance on my part then, being about as driven as a wet lettuce, I'd get a little part-time job that would keep the brain cells from dying off but I wouldn't go about setting up companies and trying to be the next Branson (or whoever).

    Some people are not born to be serial entrepreneurs we just like to turn up, get paid, go home.

    Leave a comment:


  • tl97
    replied
    My goal is for work to be something I can do if I want to, not because I have to - essentially the FIRE approach.

    Leave a comment:


  • hobnob
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Running your own business can be a lot more stressful, a lot more risky, and a lot more time consuming than working for/helping others. But that's maybe just my different mindset.
    A compromise would be to work through an umbrella rather than running your own limited company. That way you'd avoid politics, appraisals, etc. but you'd also be able to take gaps between contracts and only work when you get bored or want a bit of extra cash (assuming that your "plan B" covers your routine expenses).

    Leave a comment:


  • courtg9000
    replied
    Having a plan B is always a good idea, contractor or not. You never know what will happen next or when you will need it.
    Speaking as someone who used theirs I was pleased to get away from traditional contracting. I still did some more along pureplay consultancy lines with a product/service combination.
    I had to modify plan B severely and got slightly caught when I needed a plan C in a hurry 18 months ago.
    My advice is to have a number of plans to cover situations and if you can get multiple income steams to work (not everyone can) especially passive or passiveish then do it!

    Leave a comment:


  • Antman
    replied
    Originally posted by tinroof View Post
    I don't think I have posted on this forum despite contracting for 10 years in Software and reading threads on a regular basis. I dropped by to offer words of encouragement for going the way of your Plan B.

    Fundamentally, exchanging your time for money limits your earning capacity even if you earn £2000 a day. Combine that with the repetitive nature of watching clients' projects burn with the perpetual cycle of outsourcing, insourcing, management interference and incompetence as well as all the headwinds such as the Off Payroll rules and the Conservatives apparent stance of being anti small business, I decided to make a change.

    I'm now down to working 20 hours per week with my current client who will be my last when I finish up in August.

    With many more contractors now working from home, there is an opportunity to dedicate some of your time each week to Plan B and building up multiple streams of income which is somewhat easier now commutes and a lot of office presenteeism has been banished.

    However it is challenging and you must be prepared in the short term to cut expenses to the bone, be frugal and constantly upskill and push yourself out of the comfort zone (tricky for us introverted geeks).

    If you can do that, the feeling of earning whether or not you you choose to work that day is unbeatable and I heartily recommend it.
    Wow 1 post since 2015, top work!

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by achilles View Post

    Why would you not start your own business instead where you would not have a boss and no politics?
    Because that can lead to a level of stress the poster doesn't need now they have the income.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by achilles View Post

    Why would you not start your own business instead where you would not have a boss and no politics?
    Maybe get a job at a charity, or something where you're helping others, because you have the time.

    Running your own business can be a lot more stressful, a lot more risky, and a lot more time consuming than working for/helping others. But that's maybe just my different mindset.

    Leave a comment:


  • achilles
    replied
    Originally posted by SussexSeagull View Post
    If you could offer me a guarenteed 100k a year with no risk then I would probably get a permanent job, possibly outside IT. Knowing I didn't need the salary to survive would hopefully prove liberating in dealing with the politics.
    Why would you not start your own business instead where you would not have a boss and no politics?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X