• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

User Profile

Collapse

Profile Sidebar

Collapse
malvolio
malvolio
More fingers than teeth
Last Activity: Today, 19:57
Joined: 6 July 2005
Location: Walking in the garden, dreaming of Olivia...
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
  • Source
Clear All
new posts

  • malvolio
    replied to And the decline continues
    Interesting insight, thanks.

    But as you say the problem is further up the chain of command. Ultimately it will rest with the Minister and how effectively they challenge HMT for money across their Departmental remit. Given we seem to have given up having any kind of expertise at Ministerial*...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to And the decline continues
    But this is equally likely a case of costing the direct research done by Jodrell Bank in radio astronomy and disregarding the positive impact the presence of such a famous facility has in attracting generations of scientists working in the field.

    And the monetary savings from this cancellation...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to And the decline continues
    Unbelievable. Another quango forgetting its raison d'etre.....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    OK, fair enough.

    So now we know the state pension is seen as a benefit. Wonder why it's not tax exempt then......
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    No, that implies that 45% of welfare expenditure goes to pensioners. Does that include the pension itself...? After all, a lot of pensioners get additional welfare payments....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    Define "Right Wing"... I'm a shade to the right of centre, in that I prefer a capitalist-based society (mainly 'cos it works), provided it doesn't leave the disadvantaged behind. Which Thatcher did to an extent and was one of her main failures

    Ditto "socialist", which...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    Probably true. The "issue" was that the 70s were a disaster, the 80s got us out of it, the 90s went quite well until socialism reasserted itself and the 2000s have been a story of continual decline. given that, any attempt to take us back before the 80s would be a disaster. That, sadly, appears...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    I do know who the various people involved are, what they did, and what their names are.

    So in your expert opinion Reeves and Starmer have noting to do with the decisions over UK finances following the 2024 election? The ones that now put us in a worse position that we were following Truss's...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    Let me help. Starmer and Reeves. Both now elsewhere.

    HTH. BIDI....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    Let me quote the OBR analysis:


    For comparison it's around 36-40% now....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    It makes more sense than your comment. Where did I say "increases in tax"? Or can you not differentiate between tax rates and tax revenue? Or between borrowing and income?...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    Correct. But his immediate predecessors (hint: plural, surnames start with S and R) outperformed Truss several times over. Plus her ideas were sound, but she was too inept to enact them properly. S and R didn't even have ideas, only dogma....
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    So you think HMG buys stuff from some international Tesco?

    Mostly it went on reducing taxation in several areas, creating more revenue by freeing up money for you and me to spend and for others to invest. Mostly it went on reducing borrowing to fund routine expenditure; armies and welfare...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    Oh yes. We kept it in the dining room and very nice it was......
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    You still don't understand the 0s, do you. The govenment wasn't spending taxes on "stuff".

    We went from high interest to low interest rates (meaning people could buy houses), inflation from double figures to 2.5%, national debt (the gap between government income and borrowing)...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    Except that's the sad SM phrase that everyone uses when they want to prove they don't understand economics. People get rich by growing businesses, growing businesses employ more people, all those people are spending money and paying taxes. he people that started that cycle get the most because they...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    Totally agree. Putin is failing in Ukraine because he is meeting strong (and apparently totally unexpected) resistance.

    Defence is not a strategy, it is a basic necessity if you are to stand up to aggressors of any kind. Sun Tzu had it right - the best defence is to win without needing...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    Agreed

    Also quite pleased at how many deadheads have been binned from key places in Starmer's cabinet...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    I didn't, but it's nice to see your alternative view...

    So what you are saying is that the capitalism that created Britain is wrong and we should have stuck with feudalism?

    The failures of the various denationalised industries and services are down to a lack of effective enforceable...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied to Now we're going back to the 1970s
    Yes, taxes went up. They were spent in useful directions though, unlike today.

    Housing is a whole other mess though, with multiple causes. Right to Buy is only one element of that.

    But enough of the theory. What did Thatcher destroy?...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:

No activity results to display
Show More
 

30 September 2025


29 September 2025


28 September 2025


25 September 2025


19 September 2025


18 September 2025


17 September 2025


2 September 2025


Working...
X