Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Thought so. The secret with cloggies is that they'll never listen and will always do things their own way, so you just have to let them fook it all up and then charge a tulipload of money to straighten things out afterwards; it's what keeps the immense 'consultancy' industry going in NL and an even bigger training and courses industry. Of course this is easier as a contractor.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
Thought so. The secret with cloggies is that they'll never listen and will always do things their own way, so you just have to let them fook it all up and then charge a tulipload of money to straighten things out afterwards; it's what keeps the immense 'consultancy' industry going in NL and an even bigger training and courses industry. Of course this is easier as a contractor.
Natuurlijk!
"Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what's for lunch." - Orson Welles
It's exactly what I'm doing now; they've gone completely over the top with procedures and scripted testing and quality systems and whatnot here, but I'm biding my time. I give them some workshops on alternative ideas like exploratory testing and agile testing, which they recieve quite well as I tactfully tell them it's adding weapons to their armoury, even though it actually contradicts everything they do. But that's OK; I'll wait until the project ends up in a mess and nothing can get done on time and the end customer's getting hot under the collar, and then suggest 'remember what I told you about <...> during that course? it could be a good time to try that now'. There's no other way with cloggies; they're just too stubborn to believe you until they bugger it up themselves.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
It's exactly what I'm doing now; they've gone completely over the top with procedures and scripted testing and quality systems and whatnot here, but I'm biding my time. I give them some workshops on alternative ideas like exploratory testing and agile testing, which they recieve quite well as I tactfully tell them it's adding weapons to their armoury, even though it actually contradicts everything they do. But that's OK; I'll wait until the project ends up in a mess and nothing can get done on time and the end customer's getting hot under the collar, and then suggest 'remember what I told you about <...> during that course? it could be a good time to try that now'. There's no other way with cloggies; they're just too stubborn to believe you until they bugger it up themselves.
These guys are b*ggering it up big time but are too thick to realise.
"Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what's for lunch." - Orson Welles
Comment