Tonight's major motion picture premiere was Gladiator II (2024) in which much the same stuff happens as in the first one, though it gets a bit more bogged down in Roman politics at times when the first found more exciting ways to move things along, even with politics. It was OK, but I think it's fair to say that if you're going to make a sequel to the original, you should give it a bit more oomph than this 
And then a rewatch of Angels & Demons (2009) because I rewatched the Da Vinci one a few weeks ago so now I'm doomed to rewatch this and the other one. My main takeaway - apart from the fact that they totally misrepresented the procedures around conclave for dramatic effect, though I suppose they didn't account for people watching a few weeks after one - was that it's a pretty good thriller for the most part but ruined by the ludicrous premises on which it's founded. If you can go to all the trouble of concocting a good action-based story, why not start by concocting a good idea around which to construct it rather than some ludicrous bollocks about antimatter or, indeed, the notion that some bloke gets to be a professor at Harvard because he can sound excited when recognising a widely-known symbol like the keys of St. Peter on a crest? (I may be biased because my school in Liverpool was St. Peter's so the crossed keys crest was emblazoned on my uniform at a formative age.) Still, the books flew off the shelves in airports, so what do I know?
Goodnight all

And then a rewatch of Angels & Demons (2009) because I rewatched the Da Vinci one a few weeks ago so now I'm doomed to rewatch this and the other one. My main takeaway - apart from the fact that they totally misrepresented the procedures around conclave for dramatic effect, though I suppose they didn't account for people watching a few weeks after one - was that it's a pretty good thriller for the most part but ruined by the ludicrous premises on which it's founded. If you can go to all the trouble of concocting a good action-based story, why not start by concocting a good idea around which to construct it rather than some ludicrous bollocks about antimatter or, indeed, the notion that some bloke gets to be a professor at Harvard because he can sound excited when recognising a widely-known symbol like the keys of St. Peter on a crest? (I may be biased because my school in Liverpool was St. Peter's so the crossed keys crest was emblazoned on my uniform at a formative age.) Still, the books flew off the shelves in airports, so what do I know?

Goodnight all


Comment