Originally posted by darmstadt
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Daily Fail
Collapse
X
-
Why? It will be automatically built into all cars as they are built so would cost money and effort to remove / disable it...merely at clientco for the entertainment -
Eh? All I was pointing out was that it wasn't law yet. I already have it in my car and my new one that I've ordered has it as well...Originally posted by eek View PostWhy? It will be automatically built into all cars as they are built so would cost money and effort to remove / disable it...“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
If it also detects people speeding (??) the weight is nothing compared to the savings in fuel.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostAlso, I wonder how heavy the things are - Even if they're fairly light, that extra weight in hundreds of millions of cars throughout the EU will burn millions of tons more fuel.
So much for the EU's green agenda
edit: The scheme is obviously a stalking horse for a mileage tax - If in doubt, follow the money
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Yeah, it costs a bloody fortune to cut off a mobile phone. That's why so many people get away with not paying their bills yet still being able to use themOriginally posted by eek View PostWhy? It will be automatically built into all cars as they are built so would cost money and effort to remove / disable it...
Comment
-
+1 Those mobile phone blocker units are very expensive. Something should be done about it.Originally posted by NickFitz View PostYeah, it costs a bloody fortune to cut off a mobile phone. That's why so many people get away with not paying their bills yet still being able to use them
Comment
-
20.94 from Amazon: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Roughneck-Sl...=sledge+hammerOriginally posted by BrilloPad View Post+1 Those mobile phone blocker units are very expensive. Something should be done about it.“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Today 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Yesterday 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42

Comment