Getting back to the point, the MW study came up with this figure of a £3K deficit  (which it based only on EU immigrants ) because of assumptions that they have more children and claim more housing benefit as they are disproportionately based in the South of England.
That may be true, but if they claim less unemployment benefit and pensions and healthcare because they are younger (at least at the current snapshot of time) then it would seem the indigenous population may have a higher deficit.
					That may be true, but if they claim less unemployment benefit and pensions and healthcare because they are younger (at least at the current snapshot of time) then it would seem the indigenous population may have a higher deficit.



				
				
				
				
Comment