• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Immigrants cost Britain £3,000 a day each, says report

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    So according to vetran, you are not foreign born so not an immigrant.
    Oh great, about 175,000,000 brothers and sisters in Nigeria will be pleased to hear that! I'll get on the blower to them now shall I, put the kettle on!

    Oops, sorry, 175,000,000 minus the ones born while Nigeria was suspended from the Commonwealth in '95 to '99 with the exception of those who were born in any disputed border areas with coommonwealth countries, erm, it gets a complicated, so what I want to as is this; why does anyone bloody well care?
    Last edited by Mich the Tester; 13 March 2014, 12:38.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      Oh great, about 175,000,000 brothers and sisters in Nigeria will be pleased to hear that! I'll get on the blower to them now shall I, put the kettle on!

      Oops, sorry, 175,000,000 minus the ones born while Nigeria was suspended from the Commonwealth in '95 to '99 with the exception of those who were born in any disputed border areas with coommonwealth countries, erm, it gets a complicated, so what I want to as is this; why does anyone bloody well care?
      If vetran says it's true, then it must be.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
        So according to vetran, you are not foreign born so not an immigrant.
        how do you get to that conclusion?

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by vetran View Post
          how do you get to that conclusion?
          He was born in a Commonwealth country.

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by sasguru View Post
            Personally I would guess there would not be much difference between the natives and immigrant population overall because we don't have a selective immigration policy - we take brain surgeons and people like mos.
            But what about the inherent superiority of the British populace? Surely that must be a factor.
            While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
              He was born in a Commonwealth country.
              so he is 'Foreign Born', the commonwealth may have conferred some rights but he is still factually an emigrant from his country of birth and therefore an immigrant to the UK. Even if he has a right to a UK passport due to his parents, just like Boris.

              If I were born on the Guernsey I would technically be an immigrant in absolute terms if I moved to Brighton. But for the purposes of then census I'm considered a UK native.


              The way the census defines it was above.


              as far as I can see there is a legal distinction 'right of abode' is not citizenship.

              https://www.gov.uk/right-of-abode


              you keep thinking being an immigrant is a bad thing, its not in itself.

              The argument is should we manage immigration more effectively and have an honest open debate about what benefits we can get from it.

              Currently the figures proffered and propaganda always seem to show all immigrants are good and anyone who says otherwise is a racist.

              As Sas said finally its all about assumptions, Migrationwatch said some assumptions where wrong, on the face of it these points seem sensible.

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by vetran View Post
                so he is 'Foreign Born',
                Have to stop you there. He was not born in a foreign country because Commonwealth countries are not foreign countries so how can he be 'foreign born'?

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by doodab View Post
                  But what about the inherent superiority of the British populace? Surely that must be a factor.
                  you been to some pubs on a Saturday night, quite a few British hardly seem superior in any way.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by vetran View Post
                    you been to some pubs on a Saturday night, quite a few British hardly seem superior in any way.
                    Hence my agreement with SAS, ironically expressed, that "there would not be much difference between the natives and immigrant population overall because we don't have a selective immigration policy".

                    Although TBH I did tend, before I became ill, to go to superior gaffs full of superior people with my mixed group of friends some of whom are real live immigrants. Merkins, Hermans, Poles, Spaniards, Sri Lankans, we'll take anyone with a brain really, even Scotsmen at a pinch.
                    Last edited by doodab; 13 March 2014, 13:03.
                    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by vetran View Post
                      Currently the figures proffered and propaganda always seem to show all immigrants are good and anyone who says otherwise is a racist.
                      No, many figures suggest that many, maybe even most 'immigrants' (which we are still struggling to define satisfactorily) are basically OK to good.

                      The figures show us nothing about whether somebody is a 'racist' depending on his or her opinions.

                      The headlines (propaganda) in some sections of the media suggest that many immigrants are not all that great.

                      So we have some figures from some studies carried out by some organisations, and we have conjecture from some media companies; given my limited time to analyse all this information, I'm inclined to be more receptive to the figures than the conjecture, but still view them critically.
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X