The official "World War ]i[" thread

[darmstadt]

This chap Lyndon Larouche called out everything we are currently witnessing, 2 months ago.

Ukraine, WW3 & Extinction - Lyndon LaRouche & Alex Jones | War and Conflict

You know that he's an absolute total nutter? Starting as a Marxist, then radical Trotskyist but also with links to the extreme right wing (such as the KKK), the supporting Reagan, now seemingly a democrat. Spent a few years in prison for fraud although he blamed it on Raisa Gorbachev , started numerous political parties in Europe (i.e. European Workers Party), invented SDI and so on. Total crackpot....

This is the man who said:

Since late 1973, I have been repeatedly the target of serious assassination threats and my wife has been three times the target of attempted assassination... My enemies are the circles of McGeorge Bundy, Henry Kissinger, Soviet President Yuri Andropov, W. Averell Harriman, certain powerful bankers, and the Socialist and Nazi Internationals, as well as international drug traffickers, Colonel Gadaffi, Ayatollah Khomaini and the Malthusian lobby." (*)

Puts it better than me: Lyndon LaRouche - RationalWiki





(* and apparently the Queen of England)

[doodab]

And here he is predicting global thermonuclear war no later than 1977 if Jimmy Carter is elected.

[suityou01]

It is true, Mr Larouche has been wrong on a few occasions, and maybe is a bit of a loony. But he's right about this goddamit

[MicrosoftBob]

It is true, Mr Larouche has been wrong on a few occasions, and maybe is a bit of a loony. But he's right about this goddamit

A stopped clock will be right by accident

[doodab]

It is true, Mr Larouche has been wrong on a few occasions, and maybe is a bit of a loony. But he's right about this goddamit

How come you will ignore statements from the horses mouth, discount factual reports and analysis in the mainstream media on whatever basis but you won't apply an ounce of critical analysis to the statements of a raging nutter?

[sasguru]

How come you will ignore statements from the horses mouth, discount factual reports and analysis in the mainstream media on whatever basis but you won't apply an ounce of critical analysis to the statements of a raging nutter?

It's because he's thick as 2 short planks.

[suityou01]

How come you will ignore statements from the horses mouth, discount factual reports and analysis in the mainstream media on whatever basis but you won't apply an ounce of critical analysis to the statements of a raging nutter?

I am critically analysing you.

HTH

[suityou01]

It's because he's thick as 2 short planks.

Bless.

[doodab]

I am critically analysing you.

HTH

Your point being what?

I've stated that NATO has expanded since the downfall of the USSR (a historical fact you can easily verify), pointed out that no one in a position to do anything about it has suggested that military response is an option (again, easily verified if you pay attention to what the people in power are actually saying and doing) and provided extended quotes from people you yourself have quoted selectively (again easily verified if you don't filter out anything you don't want to hear).

You have provided a 20 minute rant from a nutjob, interspersed with adverts for virility potions, wherein it is claimed that world war three is imminent at the behest of the British empire which still runs the world, and this will save the empire's economy by killing everyone on the planet. Putting aside the fact that the empire disintegrated years ago, and ignoring the fact that it's not actually much of a plan for saving anything, it just doesn't seem very likely given the pains our leaders are going to to avoid military intervention does it?

Now, as you accept this guys conclusion one presumes you accept his premises, so can you please provide us with some evidence that a) the British empire still runs the world including the US, b) killing everyone on the planet will save the economy and c) our leaders are planning a military escalation?

The other thing to bear in mind is that my opinions that the Russian response to NATO enlargement is predictable and that WW3 is highly unlikely as nobody wants it and the Russians aren't actually preparing for it at all, are entirely my own, not recycled from someone else's opinion piece, which means I have done some actual research and have at least a basic grasp of the facts, unlike the people you are inclined to quote.

Perhaps I should start blogging as "the raging fruitloop", then you would lap up everything I say like a hungry kitten with a bowl of cream.

[suityou01]

Your point being what?

<Foaming rant that was too long to read>

Just because I listen to one bit of his theory doesn't mean I take the kitchen sink from him.

Back in January he said this conflict was coming, it would be a battle between east and west, it was going to be neo-nazis from the west orchestrating. He was, how can I put it gently, fooking spot fooking on.

So not bad for a "raging nutter". Again you analyse, cross reference with other bloggers and mainstream meeja and make your own mind up.

This aint over by a long chalk. And don't forget China and Japan, that's another potential flashpoint.

Now if you don't mind, I've got to go and stock up on long life groceries.