• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

USA’s top Climate Change Expert Lied

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Can you share the linky to the research?
    indeedy

    it was not research, it was testimony to the senate in 1988
    (\__/)
    (>'.'<)
    ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

    Comment


      Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
      The original statement was >100% out. CO2 rose from 356ppm in 1993 to 394ppm in January this year just over 10%, he stated 25%. Data is here

      Trends in Carbon Dioxide

      Admirably, he's clarified that he meant 25% of the total increase has occurred in the last 20 years, which is more plausible. Short term trends (anything < 30 yrs really) can mislead, for example for the first 15 of the last 20 years, temperatures rose at twice the average predicted rate:-

      Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs



      Straw Man. Imagine there was no greenhouse gas warming influence, woiuld the graph be a horizontal line? Of course not, there are fluctuations due to ocean circulation changes, the solar cycle and many other natural factors. Over the short term, natural variability can mask the more gradual increase. And yes, the models do predict such plateaux:-

      http://www.scilogs.de/klimalounge/fi...Iscenario1.png



      Calling BS on that. The most pessimistic projections predict 5-6C by the end of the century. Waste of time asking for your source, I guess.
      Well you're wasting your time with that post, I meant 25% of man's total contribution, which I explained just before you spent half-an-hour putting that superfluous post together.

      You were arguing the wrong point.
      Last edited by BlasterBates; 19 December 2013, 14:52.
      I'm alright Jack

      Comment


        Americans tend to favour Farenheit, and back in 1988 this was probably the norm. More recently celsius is the de facto standard in climate science.

        So +20F possible in Northern latitudes by 2025-2050? I make that +11.1C. If you generate the global anomaly map for November

        http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gi...s=1200&pol=reg

        you see that most of Siberia was 4-8C above the 1951-1980 baseline. So we're about two-thirds of the way to Hansen's predicted outcome with 12-37 years to go.

        To answer your question, my opinion of Hansen as a scientist just went up. A prediction made in 1988 using a model you could run on a 386 seems to be coming to pass ...
        My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

        Comment


          You were arguing the wrong point.
          Which part of

          Admirably, he's clarified that he meant 25% of the total increase has occurred in the last 20 years,
          is giving you the problem?
          My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

          Comment


            Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
            Americans tend to favour Farenheit, and back in 1988 this was probably the norm. More recently celsius is the de facto standard in climate science.

            So +20F possible in Northern latitudes by 2025-2050? I make that +11.1C. If you generate the global anomaly map for November

            http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gi...s=1200&pol=reg

            you see that most of Siberia was 4-8C above the 1951-1980 baseline. So we're about two-thirds of the way to Hansen's predicted outcome with 12-37 years to go.

            To answer your question, my opinion of Hansen as a scientist just went up. A prediction made in 1988 using a model you could run on a 386 seems to be coming to pass ...




            well I live in the Northern latitudes. so i will be 20f warmer in eleven years, all year round than I was when DieHard was released in 1988?
            if that happened, snow would be a thing of the past


            Last edited by EternalOptimist; 19 December 2013, 15:13.
            (\__/)
            (>'.'<)
            ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

            Comment


              Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
              I dont think he is far wrong.
              CO2 emissions increased quite fast, 25% seems like a reasonable ballpark figure, i would have to check (I know he said co2 and not co2 emissions)

              the point is, co2 and co2 emissions are rising rapidly. According to the catastrophists, the planet should be warming fast. it isnt.



              Dont forget, your Nasa hero, James Hansen predicted a 20 degree rise in temps by 2025.

              thats twenty degrees in the next 11 years. Do you honestly believe that will happen? honestly
              Do you mean this?

              If the current pace of the buildup of these gases continues, the effect is likely to be a warming of 3 to 9 degrees Fahrenheit from the year 2025 to 2050, according to these projections. This rise in temperature is not expected to be uniform around the globe but to be greater in the higher latitudes, reaching as much as 20 degrees, and lower at the Equator.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                Do you mean this?
                thats the bit , yes. 20f at the higher latitudes.
                thats us, that is
                (\__/)
                (>'.'<)
                ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                Comment


                  Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                  thats the bit , yes. 20f at the higher latitudes.
                  thats us, that is
                  So he said by 2025 like you said he said?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                    So he said by 2025 like you said he said?
                    that was his window between 2025 and 2050

                    like I said, lets give the old boobie 36 years, out of kindness
                    (\__/)
                    (>'.'<)
                    ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                      that was his window between 2025 and 2050

                      like I said, lets give the old boobie 36 years, out of kindness
                      So not what you said at all. I'm starting to understand how you feel about Al Gore, and I can't be arsed wasting more time with bulltulip right now. Another day and we can do it all again. All the best as always.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X