• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Woolwich Incident

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    One quote:

    The British foreign policy bit is crap too. If I came from Pakistan etc. I would be pissed off with invasions and drones killing innocent people as well. The daft US/UK policies over many decades have fuelled Islamic fundamentalism.
    Christians are persecuted in Iraq, Syria and Egypt. Shall we kill a few muzz in revenge?

    OTOH, US/UK policies are stupid, but they are not the intellectual cause of Islamism. Read Sayyid Qutb. Islam is a supremacist religion and will always be.

    Comment


      Terrorist words here:

      Woolwich attack: the terrorist's rant - Telegraph

      Don't agree with the murder but I agree with most of what he said.
      bloggoth

      If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
      John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

      Comment


        Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
        I see your point, shooting him was perfectly excusable under those circumstances
        reductio ad absurdium - nice gambit.

        I never said it was if you read my post. I did however say he shouldn't have been here.

        They should have stopped and questioned him away from the crowds, they shouldn't have misidentified him as a terrorist. He should have been at home in Brazil. all were factors.

        Comment


          Originally posted by vetran View Post
          reductio ad absurdium - nice gambit.

          I never said it was if you read my post. I did however say he shouldn't have been here.

          They should have stopped and questioned him away from the crowds, they shouldn't have misidentified him as a terrorist. He should have been at home in Brazil. all were factors.
          Because there was some uncertainty as to the status of his documents, and he might not even have known about that? Has no government department ever made a mistake in the procedures or documentation affecting you, or anyone else? Really, you're stretching this argument beyond breaking point; concluding someone's an illegal immigrant because there is some irregularity in the paperwork is like concluding you're a fraudster because you or the taxman or your accountant spelt your address incorrectly in a tax form. You wouldn't consider that fair or reasonable, so don't apply different standards to Menezes.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            Christians are persecuted in Iraq, Syria and Egypt. Shall we kill a few muzz in revenge?
            We don't because we don't think like that and it illustrates why Islam is the problem. No other faith appears to regard every conflict/tension in the world that involves those of that faith as an attack on it. Nigerians probably have no better grasp of Iraqi/Afghan culture than we do, Islam is the only aspect of commonality.

            Not to say that we have any right to interfere in their cultures without very, very good reason for our own defence. Invasions of Pakistan and Afghanistan made not an ounce of sense.
            Last edited by xoggoth; 23 May 2013, 11:54.
            bloggoth

            If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
            John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

            Comment


              Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
              Invasions of Pakistan and Afghanistan made not an ounce of sense.
              When was Pakistan invaded?

              Comment


                Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
                We don't because we don't think like that and it illustrates why Islam is the problem. No other faith appears to regard every conflict/tension in the world that involves those of that faith as an attack on it. Nigerians probably have no better grasp of Iraqi/Afghan culture than we do, Islam is the only aspect of commonality.

                Not to say that we have any right to interfere in their cultures without very, very good reason for our own defence. Invasions of Pakistan and Afghanistan made not an ounce of sense.
                Nigerians are suffering more than most right now, what with Boko Haram going mad all over the country. Booko Haram are seen by some as an extension of the Maitatsine movement of the 70s, founded by a mad imam who believed that Mohammed wasn't the real prophet. The main islamic leader in Nigeria is the Sultan of Sokoto, who hates Boko Haram and they've tried to kill him a few times.
                Last edited by Mich the Tester; 23 May 2013, 12:00.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  Yep. But I sometimes wonder if political/religious extremism itself is a mental health problem.
                  I have been thinking this for quite a while now.

                  Mind you, I never met an extremist who didnt think he was in the centre
                  (\__/)
                  (>'.'<)
                  ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                    I have been thinking this for quite a while now.

                    Mind you, I never met an extremist who didnt think he was in the centre
                    Thing is, it's difficult to define what is extreme. I hold views regarding freedom of migration/immigration that are not exactly mainstream, but then in the context of academics researching the subject they wouldn't be seen as extreme.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                      Thing is, it's difficult to define what is extreme. I hold views regarding freedom of migration/immigration that are not exactly mainstream, but then in the context of academics researching the subject they wouldn't be seen as extreme.
                      Well, this is where the 'do unto others' and the maximisation of human happiness come in

                      religion and humanism come together quite nicely here i think
                      (\__/)
                      (>'.'<)
                      ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X