• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Gay marriage

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Why resort to that kind of assumption?

    Because they disagree with you?
    Or because he is one of them.....
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    Comment


      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      Why resort to that kind of assumption?

      Because they disagree with you?
      I like Old Greg's phrase for this:

      Non-religious bigots
      My mind has gone blank. I wonder if it was always that way.

      Comment


        Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
        It's interesting that one third are against. They can't all be religious bigots, so what are their reasons?
        I am pretty surprised... I thought virtually everyone would support it.
        Originally posted by MaryPoppins
        I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
        Originally posted by vetran
        Urine is quite nourishing

        Comment


          Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
          Gurdwara
          You Sikh?

          If not they always translate it to Temple for non Sikhs and commonly use Temple when talking in English. The Signage is Sikh Temple then"Gurdwara X".

          I doubt most of us are Sikh it makes any sense to use the native word.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            Why resort to that kind of assumption?

            Because they disagree with you?
            Excluding a portion of society based on something they are born and who don't break the law, is in my mind irrational. Same as excluding someone because of their race.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Old Hack View Post
              I still don't know how I lucked out that my wife wanted to marry me
              Yes, quite a few of us have mulled that one over. Have you had her eyesight tested, and at the very least, a quick check of her marbles done?

              “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

              Comment


                Originally posted by istvan View Post
                I like Old Greg's phrase for this:

                Non-religious bigots
                Don't be daft, proggy already told us how all bad things are due to religion.
                Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                Originally posted by vetran
                Urine is quite nourishing

                Comment


                  Originally posted by proggy View Post
                  Excluding a portion of society based on something they are born and who don't break the law, is in my mind irrational. Same as excluding someone because of their race.
                  ...until someone gives a rational explanation for their opposition to gay marriage?
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                    ...until someone gives a rational explanation for their opposition to gay marriage?
                    I've yet to hear one, which is because there isn't one, which is also true for racism.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by proggy View Post
                      I've yet to hear one, which is because there isn't one, which is also true for racism.
                      The first bit is correct. I haven't heard what I would consider a good rational argument against gay marriage either, but I am open to reason. I don't assume that if I haven't heard a good reason, that there isn't one. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X