• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Why women should leave men who are violent the first time

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Having read his posts he did not advocate violence against women he actually afforded them the respect that they should not feel or behave as if they are victims.
    We men should also be allowed the freedom to say that women are highly manipulative game players which compensates for their lack of physical power .
    Wim always makes out that we ignore the other victims of domestic abuse, racism, sexism etc and then starts going on about how put on upon certain men are i.e. the group he belongs to.

    He forgets that if we as a society can't deal with the people who make up the majority of the victims there is little chance we will deal with other incidents.

    In the case of domestic violence there are a whole load of victims who are normally ignored and not taken seriously not just men. Though in those cases people don't tend to laugh they just pretend to not hear.

    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    The notion of equality is meaningless nonsense. It is also lazy in how it crudely sums up an ideal of what we in society should be aiming for.
    You still don't get it - Equality doesn't mean the same.

    It merely means giving people an equal chance of being able to do/participate in whatever regardless of socio-economic background, ethnicity, religion etc.

    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Wims point was never to approve of violence it was to say that women are not always (in the case of the Rochdale incident where they were victims) the innocents that people make them out to be.
    Lots of the victims in the Rochdale case were children.

    Regardless due to the sh*t background they came from they were easy to exploit.

    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    His mistake was probably in not making his points on a post that was about violence against women- because you women have hysterically put two and two together and made five.

    Shame on you
    There is no shame involved because if he wanted people not to get offended he would write his posts like you.
    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by cojak View Post
      You've pushed your opinions too far now wim.

      Goodbye.
      I'm piling into violent gay pornsite shares before markets open.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
        Having read his posts he did not advocate violence against women he actually afforded them the respect that they should not feel or behave as if they are victims.
        His point was that that women are highly manipulative game players which compensates for their lack of physical power - before you go off on one NOTHING except self defence justifies violence against women - or men even . I will add whilst I am it that The notion of equality is meaningless nonsense. It is also lazy in how it crudely sums up an ideal of what we in society should be aiming for.
        Wims point was never to approve of violence it was to say that women are not always (in the case of the Rochdale incident where they were victims) the innocents that people make them out to be.
        His mistake was probably in making his points on a post that was about violence against women- because you women have hysterically put two and two together and made five.
        Shame on you
        He's gone because he went beyond the pale when offending a Mod. I wasn't involved in this argument (because wim is usually on my virtual ignore list) but I won't go against NAT on this point.

        Shame on you DA for jumping to conclusions.
        "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
        - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

        Comment


          #64
          Occasionally, wim had a point. A number of times, at first glance he was going to get an infraction, but in context, I could understand where he was coming from. However, I've come to the conclusion that he phrased things deliberately so that he could claim careful reading of what he wrote showed he wasn't being offensive. For that reason - he's out.

          If he wasn't trolling then I for one got fed up of reading his poisonous diatribes.
          Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
            Occasionally, wim had a point. A number of times, at first glance he was going to get an infraction, but in context, I could understand where he was coming from. However, I've come to the conclusion that he phrased things deliberately so that he could claim careful reading of what he wrote showed he wasn't being offensive. For that reason - he's out.

            If he wasn't trolling then I for one got fed up of reading his poisonous diatribes.
            What happens in General, stays in General.
            You know what they say about assumptions!

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Diver View Post
              Restrain her or Walk away. call the police, that's what they are there for.

              Men that hit women are invariably cowards who feel empowered by bullying and abusing those weaker than themselves, and are more often than not, child abusers too.


              A couple of years ago I was awakened at about 2 by the sound of an argument outside my bedroom window. A bird was giving some bloke a hard time, getting more and more noisey and shriller. Then she punched him in the gob, and he put his arms out to fend her off and tried to go around her.
              She wasnt having any of it and stepped into the road to block him
              She was putting her face into his , and forcing him to back peddle, then she gobbed him again, and pulled her high heel off and tried to spike him in the head.

              Then BANG, she was on her back and he walked on and left her



              (\__/)
              (>'.'<)
              ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                A couple of years ago I was awakened at about 2 by the sound of an argument outside my bedroom window. A bird was giving some bloke a hard time, getting more and more noisey and shriller. Then she punched him in the gob, and he put his arms out to fend her off and tried to go around her.
                She wasnt having any of it and stepped into the road to block him
                She was putting her face into his , and forcing him to back peddle, then she gobbed him again, and pulled her high heel off and tried to spike him in the head.

                Then BANG, she was on her back and he walked on and left her



                I hope you told your son he shouldn't hit women.
                What happens in General, stays in General.
                You know what they say about assumptions!

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                  I hope you told your son he shouldn't hit women.
                  Have you still got the scars?

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post

                    I hope you told your son he shouldn't hit women.
                    Nah, it was EO's sniper rifle.

                    They never did solve that case.
                    Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by SueEllen View Post


                      There is no shame involved because if he wanted people not to get offended he would write his posts like you.
                      I was with you Sue, until that line there - A lot of people on this forum get excited and write offensive things in General, DA included and I hope not, but probably me too.

                      I've not posted on this one as its a bit dangerous, but you're completely right, how is it that everyone's making such huge sweeping statements and generalisations.

                      Domestic Violence is awful, and its not always on women either, look at New Zealands interesting background on fighting it.

                      Its not right, and totally unacceptable no matter who its against.

                      I had a female friend years ago (I'm not allowed them anymore ) and she was a victim, but did always go back - through pure love and commitment. I both respected and resented her behaviour at the same time.

                      Thankfully now, after the lads beat the tulip out of him - he split up with her and shes happily married to a lovely guy who's a copper. I still think that, without our intervention "gangster style" she'd be seriously hurt by now...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X