Why women should leave men who are violent the first time

[wim121]

She's a woman, and therefore evil, vindictive, manipulative and violent, and probably a man-hating feminist to boot. Of course she was probably beating him up for years, whilst he suffered silently, then, when the poor man snapped and throttled her unconscious, broke her jaw and nose, and gouged her eyes out, the courts decide to prosecute him. Totally unfair. Lock her up and throw away the key. And definitely don't give her any sympathy for her predicament.

"The attacked happened on April 21 last year at Tina's home in Hayle, Cornwall, after they spent the night having drinks with friends.

She went to bed but woke up to find Jenkin, who had a history of domestic violence, attacking her. "

Poor guy - he must have had several such nasty bitches in his life.

Did I ever say any of that?

No. For the record, I think what he did was unforgivable and savage, no arguments here. However, there are often two sides to every story and while this does not excuse this case, sometimes both partners whack the hell out of each other in other cases.







The rest of my comments were directed not at the story, but at BP and his personal case, so please read properly. I broke up the quotes properly, so it shouldnt be too difficult. BP tried to excuse his wife's violence and that is wrong, violence from either gender, towards either gender is just as heinous.

So instead of calling me a w*nker, take a good hard look at your sexist self. Consider why someone wanting true equality, threatens you so much that you resort to a personal attack?

This is not the first time either. You have resorted to personal attacks in the past when I have stated that men and women should be equal legally whether it is in the workplace or a domestic situation. Convenient how the only time YOU want equality, is when it benefits you personally.

[Old Hack]

ON a serious note, I was abused by a woman, I come home drunk, with a friend, saw my girlfriend, said something mildly ride, like show us your bits or something, and she dropped her dressing gown.

Bit odd I thought. She put the kettle on, and once the kettle boiled, she chucked it over me. Piked up a hammer, and attacked me with it. Slightly drunk, I kind of laughed it off, and my friend stopped her by removing the hammer. That weekend, getting changed in the changing rooms at cricket, someone asked about the blister on my rib cage, and the bruises. When I told them, they all laughed, as have every man I have told the story since. 1992. I left her shortly after. But, what makes me a bit bemused, is that every person, women, men, older, younger, they've all laughed at this story.

Would they be laughing were it the other way around?

I have never struck a woman in my life. But sometimes, I do think if you want to live by the sword, you have to live by it properly, not cry out when it bites back. Which is in no reflection to this case at all, she was an innocent and I hope he stays in jail for a long time.

[xoggoth]

Just the difference in size in this case makes the bloke much more guilty whatever the provocation, if any.

Sometimes it works both ways, recall my parents rolling around on the floor fighting. My father was a weedy little bugger and he didn't always win. Valuable lesson, I've never taken on my Missus, I probably wouldn't win either, she's quite hefty.

[d000hg]

once the kettle boiled, she chucked it over me. I kind of laughed it off

0/10

[Diver]

More More

[wim121]

Just the difference in size in this case makes the bloke much more guilty whatever the provocation, if any.

It's not so much the size. I'm quite a skinny bloke and there are many women, more muscle bound than I am.

It is purely sexism. That is why men are always guilty and women are even victims when guilty. A friend was discussing a news story the other day which goes some way to proving this. The one where a teenage woman's baby was found dead in a recycling site. She has since been mollycuddled and often, they are seen as victims of a mental affliction that need help and understanding. A man "recycling" a dead baby, would be a monster and be hounded by vigilantes before being locked up in prison with no regard to his mental suffering.

Society deems women as weak, inferior, incapable of defending themselves and see them as meek and mild, without aggression or malice. Feminists allow this, even though it goes against the ideology of equality, but it is allowed as it enables them to have preferential treatment.

ON a serious note, I was abused by a woman, I come home drunk, with a friend, saw my girlfriend, said something mildly ride, like show us your bits or something, and she dropped her dressing gown.

Men and women say or do stupid things while drunk. One would argue the correct course of action would have been for her to storm off to bed.

She put the kettle on, and once the kettle boiled, she chucked it over me. Piked up a hammer, and attacked me with it. Slightly drunk, I kind of laughed it off, and my friend stopped her by removing the hammer. That weekend, getting changed in the changing rooms at cricket, someone asked about the blister on my rib cage, and the bruises. When I told them, they all laughed, as have every man I have told the story since. 1992. I left her shortly after. But, what makes me a bit bemused, is that every person, women, men, older, younger, they've all laughed at this story.

Are you actually being serious? It is CUK, so that's why I have to ask.

I know exactly what you mean, this is the way society treats men who suffer from DV. As I said before, society finds it funny if a woman playfully slaps a man in public. Just try doing the same thing as a man against a woman, nobody will laugh.

Anyway I wouldn't laugh at that. I hope you reported her savage assault. Even if it was recorded and then ignored.

Would they be laughing were it the other way around?

No they wouldn't, a common double standard.

There are plenty of double standards.

I have never struck a woman in my life. But sometimes, I do think if you want to live by the sword, you have to live by it properly, not cry out when it bites back.

Indeed. If one is going to resort to violence, then one can't cry if they lose the fight. Quite logical, except in a feminists mind that is.

Which is in no reflection to this case at all, she was an innocent and I hope he stays in jail for a long time.

You don't know that at all.

You have one very biased news article. As I said earlier, I think it is heinous what he did and there is no excuse.

However, to say she is innocent is an over-reach. She could be a drunken slapper who nailed other guys while she was with him. She could have slapped him before, thinking that it wasn't assault as she is a woman. I suggest just those examples as I know the area and know the kind of people whom live there. Most of them are slaggy/chavvy. It's one of the better deprived areas in that region.

In short, none of us have any idea whatsoever how she behaved during the course of the relationship and what led to that pivotal moment. She could have been completely meek and mild at the hands of a brute. However this is not Jane Eyre nor are we living in Victorian times. Very few women nowadays are meek and mild in their interpersonal relations.

[Old Greg]

It's not so much the size. I'm quite a skinny bloke and there are many women, more muscle bound than I am.

It is purely sexism. That is why men are always guilty and women are even victims when guilty. A friend was discussing a news story the other day which goes some way to proving this. The one where a teenage woman's baby was found dead in a recycling site. She has since been mollycuddled and often, they are seen as victims of a mental affliction that need help and understanding. A man "recycling" a dead baby, would be a monster and be hounded by vigilantes before being locked up in prison with no regard to his mental suffering.

Society deems women as weak, inferior, incapable of defending themselves and see them as meek and mild, without aggression or malice. Feminists allow this, even though it goes against the ideology of equality, but it is allowed as it enables them to have preferential treatment.






Men and women say or do stupid things while drunk. One would argue the correct course of action would have been for her to storm off to bed.






Are you actually being serious? It is CUK, so that's why I have to ask.

I know exactly what you mean, this is the way society treats men who suffer from DV. As I said before, society finds it funny if a woman playfully slaps a man in public. Just try doing the same thing as a man against a woman, nobody will laugh.

Anyway I wouldn't laugh at that. I hope you reported her savage assault. Even if it was recorded and then ignored.






No they wouldn't, a common double standard.

There are plenty of double standards.






Indeed. If one is going to resort to violence, then one can't cry if they lose the fight. Quite logical, except in a feminists mind that is.






You don't know that at all.

You have one very biased news article. As I said earlier, I think it is heinous what he did and there is no excuse.

However, to say she is innocent is an over-reach. She could be a drunken slapper who nailed other guys while she was with him. She could have slapped him before, thinking that it wasn't assault as she is a woman. I suggest just those examples as I know the area and know the kind of people whom live there. Most of them are slaggy/chavvy. It's one of the better deprived areas in that region.

In short, none of us have any idea whatsoever how she behaved during the course of the relationship and what led to that pivotal moment. She could have been completely meek and mild at the hands of a brute. However this is not Jane Eyre nor are we living in Victorian times. Very few women nowadays are meek and mild in their interpersonal relations.

Because being a drunken slapper is provocation isn't it? She would have been asking for it? Not innocent?

W*nker, w*nker, w*nker.

And bender.

[wim121]

Because being a drunken slapper is provocation isn't it?

Cheating on a partner, or going out to bars with the opposite sex groping a partner, is enough to make either gender jealous and the cause of a lot of heated arguments.

She would have been asking for it? Not innocent?

She could have slapped him in the past, they could have fought like cat and dog. They could have both been copable to an extent in the past.

W*nker, w*nker, w*nker.

And bender.

No my dear fool, you are the w*nker. You have obviously been jerking the chicken so much, that you cant read posts properly as your eyes are sticky and laden with cum.

Try reading properly. Also while we're at it, stop being a sexist pig. Assuming women are meek, mild, innocent in all affairs and need pity or protection is extremely sexist. You need to wake up to reality my dear retard.

[oscarose]

As usual, sad to see humans reduced to animal status. As the great oh Buddha says, those people, with no control of emotion, wasting their precious intelligence in the search of status, sex and selfish desires are on the level as dogs in the park.

Smoke the green, be happy and respect yourself and others.

[Diver]

No my dear fool, you are the w*nker. You have obviously been jerking the chicken so much, that you cant read posts properly as your eyes are sticky and laden with cum.

Try reading properly. Also while we're at it, stop being a sexist pig. Assuming women are meek, mild, innocent in all affairs and need pity or protection is extremely sexist. You need to wake up to reality my dear retard.

More More