• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Nuclear explosion in Japan

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    It's not quite like that. We're not talking about wiring up a cement mixer to a 110v transformer.

    Also getting the work done would have taken time they could ill afford.

    [Suity in pub expert mode]
    Do you mean to say that managing a nuclear power station after a richter scale 9 earthquake and a tsunami is a bit more complicated than the collective wisdom of CUK might suppose?

    Stop being so bloody sensible; it just doesn't suit you.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
      It's not quite like that. We're not talking about wiring up a cement mixer to a 110v transformer.

      Also getting the work done would have taken time they could ill afford.

      [Suity in pub expert mode]
      Yeah, maybe a job for an electrician?

      Comment


        Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
        Ok I'll correct you.

        The fuel rods are housed in chamber which in turn is housed in a chuffing great concrete chamber many meters thick.

        It's only bad in that the reactor is now beyone repair and will cost money to replace.
        The coolant is now more likely to contain hazardous particulates. Not something that you'd want to vent if you want to reuse the site, let alone the reactor. Though ordinarily what's released is filtered.

        Comment


          So far the death toll is 2. The biggest nuclear catastrophe in the West since three mile Island which had a death toll of 0.
          I'm alright Jack

          Comment


            Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
            Mind meld with the fuel rods?
            At the end of Star Trek II (The Wrath of Khan) Spock goes inside the ship's main reactor chamber as the only way to save the ship, manually making repairs and being killed in the process.

            I wonder, apart from heat and poison levels, how long would a person last after exposure to a nuclear core? Can extreme levels kill you in minutes like in Star Trek or would it be certain death in a few days?
            Originally posted by MaryPoppins
            I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
            Originally posted by vetran
            Urine is quite nourishing

            Comment


              Originally posted by d000hg View Post
              At the end of Star Trek II (The Wrath of Khan) Spock goes inside the ship's main reactor chamber as the only way to save the ship, manually making repairs and being killed in the process.

              I wonder, apart from heat and poison levels, how long would a person last after exposure to a nuclear core? Can extreme levels kill you in minutes like in Star Trek or would it be certain death in a few days?
              Doesn't exposure to radiation give you super-powers?

              Comment


                Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                At the end of Star Trek II (The Wrath of Khan) Spock goes inside the ship's main reactor chamber as the only way to save the ship, manually making repairs and being killed in the process.

                I wonder, apart from heat and poison levels, how long would a person last after exposure to a nuclear core? Can extreme levels kill you in minutes like in Star Trek or would it be certain death in a few days?
                It will just destroy your cells and blood will start pishing out of you straight away.

                Nice.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
                  So far the death toll is 2. The biggest nuclear catastrophe in the West since three mile Island which had a death toll of 0.
                  What, Japan's in the west?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by stek View Post
                    What, Japan's in the west?
                    Yep, even further west than the United States.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by AtW View Post
                      In Japan maybe, but in other countries a lot of nuclear power generators are not on the shore and someone they get enough water. Given that Japan is particularly vulnerable to earthquakes that can cause tsunamis it seems very odd to protect reactors against earthquake but lack in protection against tsunami (which is to have reactor more in land - there it's practically on the shore).
                      Most if not all of the UKs reactors are on the coast.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X