Originally posted by TimberWolf
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Nuclear explosion in Japan
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
The local water infrastructure has probably been destroyed and possibly some of that great wave of sludge and junk has got into the pumps and damaged them.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Unfortunately the Reds and Greens, already ahead anyway, are probably now going to get a thumping great majority in the next election and embark the most ambitious de-industrialisation programme ever seen in a Western country.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThe meejah will say all sorts of stupid things to sell papers. Luckily Germany is run by people who are a bit smarter than 'the meejah', unlike several other countries that come to mind.
Of course to compensate for the high unemployment and dwindling tax base I've no doubt tax will be put up to excruciating high rates.
Scary.I'm alright JackComment
-
Germany's had a red-green coalition before, and the SPD have governed before; the red-green coalition wasn't brilliant, but wasn't a disaster either. I don't see why that should be different this time.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostUnfortunately the Reds and Greens, already ahead anyway, are probably now going to get a thumping great majority in the next election and embark the most ambitious de-industrialisation programme ever seen in a Western country.
Of course to compensate for the high unemployment and dwindling tax base I've no doubt tax will be put up to excruciating high rates.
Scary.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I've had to laugh at some of the attempts to link it in the press!Originally posted by doodab View PostIn this case, global warming is definitely a more plausible explanation
Comment
-
Why isn't the site teaming with international nuclear scientists laden with pumps, hoses and generators after all this time? An electrician or two probably wouldn't go amiss either.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThe local water infrastructure has probably been destroyed and possibly some of that great wave of sludge and junk has got into the pumps and damaged them.
Last I heard they were using fire hoses to fill the reactors with sea water.Comment
-
Stuff in the media is mainly bulltulip.
Here's a good explanation of what happens in this situation:
Why I am not worried about Japan’s nuclear reactors. | Morgsatlarge – blogorific.
If anything this should just show how safe a nuclear reactor can be when it's hit by an earthquake 5 times more powerful than the station was designed to deal with and then hit by the worst tsunami we have seen for generations.Comment
-
Don't know; perhaps they have their own nuclear scientists who can do the job. Perhaps everything's such a mess that nobody can do much to help. Generators aren't much use if you can't get diesel to them. Pumps and hoses aren't much use without the generators. Electricians aren't much use without electricity.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostWhy isn't the site teaming with international nuclear scientists laden with pumps, hoses and generators after all this time? An electrician or two probably wouldn't go amiss either.
Last I heard they were using fire hoses to fill the reactors with sea water.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
-
And old reactor designs to boot. Ones that wouldn't be allowed today.Originally posted by Ardesco View PostStuff in the media is mainly bulltulip.
Here's a good explanation of what happens in this situation:
Why I am not worried about Japan’s nuclear reactors. | Morgsatlarge – blogorific.
If anything this should just show how safe a nuclear reactor can be when it's hit by an earthquake 5 times more powerful than the station was designed to deal with and then hit by the worst tsunami we have seen for generations.
Edit: incidentally, good as the article is, you might want to also read Wulf C. Krueger's comment.Last edited by TimberWolf; 14 March 2011, 10:11.Comment
-
If such explosion did not break the containment then the reactor was pretty damn well designed... apart from backup power generators!
WTF was it build so close to the shore though?!?!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Today 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Yesterday 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21

Comment