Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
If they are going to hospital with only 100 milisiliverts of radiation it's completely normal and there is nothing to see here. Back in your box AtW
The 10,000 times figure is useless for a lot of reasons, not least because a time period isn't mentioned.
were sloshing about in water containing iodine, caesium and cobalt 10,000 times the normal level
Natural background radiation is tiny from these isotopes, except after nuclear reactors go bang, the biggest natural sources being potassium-40, carbon-14 and uranium IIRC.
Anyway this article says though they suffered 'radiation burns', the dose they received was 180 millisieverts. Not enough to kill, but enough to risk increased probability of cancer (100 mSv in a year), if received in a whole year. In one dose it is worse. I don't imagine they will see any more action.
All reactors at all locations in Japan are said to be in a "safe and stable" condition
edit: Scrub that. The entire announcement was:
A few people have been asking about the other nuclear plants (aside from Fukushima Daiichi). The IAEA says all units at Fukushima Daini, Onagawa and Tokai plants are in "safe and stable" condition.
The BBC ticker tape didn't show the whole text.
So Fukushima Daiichi is still on-going. Not sure why this made breaking news.
BERLIN, March 15 (Xinhua) -- German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Tuesday that seven nuclear power station built before 1980 would be temporarily shut down during the three-month moratorium on nuclear extension plan.
Sky news now reporting Japanese government now saying one of the reactor's containment vessels is damaged at the bottom, hinting at serious radiation leak.
Sky news now reporting Japanese government now saying one of the reactor's containment vessels is damaged at the bottom, hinting at serious radiation leak.
OK for those who doe't know about MOX (Reactor Three)
What is MOX fuel?
Fuel consisting of a mixture of uranium and plutonium oxides is referred to as a MOX (mixed oxide) fuel. Uranium fuel consists of enriched uranium in which the concentration of uranium 235 -- the combustible element in natural uranium -- is artificially increased. In MOX fuel, by contrast, anything from 4 to 9 percent plutonium is used in place of enriched uranium to mix with natural uranium or with the uranium that is left after enrichment (i.e., depleted uranium).
Japan's MOX Program
Part of Japan's nuclear policy is to implement the MOX utilization program; that is, to irradiate MOX fuel in conventional light water reactors (LWRs). Because of the fact that discussions are still under way with the local governments and citizens, the commercial use of MOX fuel has yet to begin. Nevertheless, as mentioned at the outset, Japan, scarce in energy resources, is continuing its policy of establishing a nuclear fuel cycle. MOX utilization, therefore, remains a crucial part of completing the fuel cycle. The Japanese electricity industry intends to continue its efforts to garner support and understanding from related parties in order to carry out the MOX utilization program in accordance with this policy
(not something to run around like a headless chicken about, but worth watching)
I'd been looking at that page over the day or so too. They removed survey sites around Fukushima (saying "under survey") and now the site doesn't work at all.
Those lullaby stories (originating from the nuclear industry I guess) that might have been worth the time of day yesterday are starting to look silly now. Things are obviously not going well and the Japanese government are asking for international help.
Let's hope the wind direction is not towards a major city if it does blow. It won't be a nuclear blast of course, just a dirty release.
IF reactor Three does go into full meltdown mode - bearing in mind the enriched Plutonium that they have been using in that reactor Three since last August - then makes its way into the atmosphere - it will by a grave challenge not only for Japan but the World.
Leave a comment: