https://www.accountancydaily.co/rode...d-tax-tribunal
Rodents ate my expenses receipts’ rejected by tax tribunal
Rodents ate my expenses receipts’ rejected by tax tribunal
-
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR -
Hmmm. Improbable but not entirely impossible. I've found stuff nibbled to bits in my shed before and rats can get into attics.Last edited by xoggoth; 1 September 2025, 21:16.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson) -
I would have used the word squirrels as they are quite common in attics but I would have upset someone...."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
If he was telling the truth, I'd ask where he bought the PPE etc. from. If it was an online order, he should have an email receipt, or he could log into his account to view his order history.
Also, as the article says, "none of them were necessary to carry out the role of a bus driver" and "the company confirmed that if Mukuna did have any expenses then Arriva would have reimbursed him".Comment
-
Some people just don't get it. Don't get into an arse-kicking contest with a centipede!From here HMRC told the appellant he could amend his tax returns but if it was found Mukuna had acted deliberately then a penalty could be incurred.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Comment