• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Those rats...

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Those rats..."

Collapse

  • xoggoth
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    I would have used the word squirrels as they are quite common in attics but I would have upset someone....
    No, he got eaten by squirrels some time ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    I would have used the word squirrels as they are quite common in attics but I would have upset someone....
    Really? - who would that be?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    From here HMRC told the appellant he could amend his tax returns but if it was found Mukuna had acted deliberately then a penalty could be incurred.
    Some people just don't get it. Don't get into an arse-kicking contest with a centipede!

    Leave a comment:


  • hobnob
    replied
    If he was telling the truth, I'd ask where he bought the PPE etc. from. If it was an online order, he should have an email receipt, or he could log into his account to view his order history.

    Also, as the article says, "none of them were necessary to carry out the role of a bus driver" and "the company confirmed that if Mukuna did have any expenses then Arriva would have reimbursed him".

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    I would have used the word squirrels as they are quite common in attics but I would have upset someone....

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Hmmm. Improbable but not entirely impossible. I've found stuff nibbled to bits in my shed before and rats can get into attics.
    Last edited by xoggoth; 1 September 2025, 21:16.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    started a topic Those rats...

    Those rats...

    https://www.accountancydaily.co/rode...d-tax-tribunal

    Rodents ate my expenses receipts’ rejected by tax tribunal

Working...
X