Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Those rats...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Those rats..."
Collapse
-
Really? - who would that be?Originally posted by SueEllen View PostI would have used the word squirrels as they are quite common in attics but I would have upset someone....
Leave a comment:
-
Some people just don't get it. Don't get into an arse-kicking contest with a centipede!From here HMRC told the appellant he could amend his tax returns but if it was found Mukuna had acted deliberately then a penalty could be incurred.
Leave a comment:
-
If he was telling the truth, I'd ask where he bought the PPE etc. from. If it was an online order, he should have an email receipt, or he could log into his account to view his order history.
Also, as the article says, "none of them were necessary to carry out the role of a bus driver" and "the company confirmed that if Mukuna did have any expenses then Arriva would have reimbursed him".
Leave a comment:
-
I would have used the word squirrels as they are quite common in attics but I would have upset someone....
Leave a comment:
-
Those rats...
https://www.accountancydaily.co/rode...d-tax-tribunal
Rodents ate my expenses receipts’ rejected by tax tribunalTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Today 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Yesterday 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Leave a comment: