• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BBC Keeping Children Safe Since 1980

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post

    Teenage girls aren't his thing, unless they have a penis...
    Yeah he's never had relationships with women...
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
      Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot from 2023-07-08 18-15-30.png
Views:	485
Size:	361.7 KB
ID:	4268490

      Yes another one.
      17 isn't exactly a child, this is about inappropriate relationships not child abuse.

      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        #13
        I'm really surprised there has been nothing leaked yet. Plenty of people must know who's been suspended so unusual a name hasn't been leaked yet. The papers must be offering a tidy sum to the first person to drop them a name.

        Holly Willoughby taking 2 months off and Jon Kay taking 2 weeks off isn't great timing I would have thought. Yes I know they've said a he so can't be Holly.
        Last edited by northernladuk; 10 July 2023, 12:18.
        'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Mordac View Post

          Teenage girls aren't his thing, unless they have a penis...
          hey watch out. that hit most of the phobic tells.
          Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
            I'm really surprised there has been nothing leaked yet. Plenty of people must know who's been suspended so unusual a name hasn't been leaked yet. The papers must be offering a tidy sum to the first person to drop them a name.

            Holly Willoughby taking 2 months off and Jon Kay taking 2 weeks off isn't great timing I would have thought. Yes I know they've said a he so can't be Holly.
            The one person who has been most talked about over on the Twitter has not come out with a denial.

            I'll be disappointed if it's him TBH. There are many, far creepier, ****ers that have piqued my Spidey senses over the years.

            ---

            Former member of IPSE.


            ---
            Many a mickle makes a muckle.

            ---

            Comment


              #16
              As she wasn't under legal age, why would anyone spend that amount of money for something you could get on any free porn site? I'd never do that, much too mean!
              bloggoth

              If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
              John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
                I'm really surprised there has been nothing leaked yet. Plenty of people must know who's been suspended so unusual a name hasn't been leaked yet. The papers must be offering a tidy sum to the first person to drop them a name.

                Holly Willoughby taking 2 months off and Jon Kay taking 2 weeks off isn't great timing I would have thought. Yes I know they've said a he so can't be Holly.
                There certainly is one front runner? HE hasn't been seen for a week, HE seems to have missed scheduled appearances...

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
                  As she wasn't under legal age!
                  Conflicting reports on gender.

                  I have seen reports using both she and he before it was changed to just 'child'.

                  Based on crack addiction stats less than 20% chance it is a female.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                    17 isn't exactly a child, this is about inappropriate relationships not child abuse.
                    The law changed in 2003 that anyone under 18 cannot give their consent to the images being taken. Before it was 16 which is why Sam Fox in The Sun was legal at the time, but would be illegal now
                    Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
                    I can't see any way to do it can you please advise?

                    I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by SimonMac View Post

                      The law changed in 2003 that anyone under 18 cannot give their consent to the images being taken. Before it was 16 which is why Sam Fox in The Sun was legal at the time, but would be illegal now
                      yeah, thats what the fuss is allegedly all about. Payments for underage nudes.

                      Otherwise it was no one else's business, unless the 17 year old victim was being pimped out, which is what got Prince Andrew in trouble.
                      Last edited by Fraidycat; 10 July 2023, 13:59.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X