Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Bring Back Boris!
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Carrie?Originally posted by vetran View Post
which of Boris's Xs?
Oh yeah she the one who will be lumbered with him as an old man."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
I can't believe I am saying this but just maybe they have some integrity?Originally posted by malvolio View Post
Which would guarantee them losing their seats. Are all of them terminally stupid?Comment
-
Lots of back-benchers do. Especially those who are now certain the shenanigans has cost them their careers and have no reason to feign allegiance to party over their constituents.Originally posted by TheDude View Post
I can't believe I am saying this but just maybe they have some integrity?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
-
I still think the binning of Boris was about more than just a few misdemeanours, individually of minor significance set against his various achievements. Most likely it was the staunch Remainers who wanted him out, plus the usual "senior but failed" malcontents like Gove and Raab. On that basis there will always be a lot of noise, boosted by the other parties, about his integrity and suitability for office. As I said before, he did a lot of good.Originally posted by d000hg View Post
Lots of back-benchers do. Especially those who are now certain the shenanigans has cost them their careers and have no reason to feign allegiance to party over their constituents.
The Harperson-led committee has already decided he was guilty of misleading Parliament over the Pierce affair and the Partygate bollocks, and have unilaterally changed the rules to mean he is guilty regardless of any one of deliberate lying, forgetfulness, carelessness or regarding what he said as expedient representation of reality . The outcome of that will be interesting. However it may mean enough support is withheld to avoid a sitting PM being found guilty.
However he is not a stupid man by any means and no doubt will have learned a lot form his defenestration.
The odds are still on Sumac, making it through. In which case, the next GE is a formality. The public don't like him and he will get the blame for high taxation, badly managed inflation and the rest. And given he was primarily the driver behind Boris going, he is not best placed to unite the rest of the idiots behind him.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
The public like Rishi a whole heck of a lot more than Boris. Your peer group might think differently but that's confirmation bias at work. Of Course Rishi managed to get caught up in Partygate too and that put a target on his back for the tabloids "oh look he's got a rich wife" which has tarnished him.
But as it is, Rishi was the government's preferred choice last time round and he basically predicted this mess if Liz pursued her policies and was vindicated. I've heard several Labour voters saying "I wish Rishi was in" and he retains a lot of love from all the people who got bounce-back-loans and furlough.
Liz was forced to instigate Rishi's "high tax" policies anyway and it seems obvious that's going to happen whoever is in charge. Remember that Rishi was chosen by, and supported by your beloved Boris as chancellor. Boris is not going to come in and slash taxes.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
All very well saying what would happen if Truss got in, but I didn't see a lot of that proactive management of the economy before then - the focus was on pushing up taxes and borrowing to fund "investment" - which we are back to again it seems - so why not 18 months ago when the seeds of the current mess were being sown?Originally posted by d000hg View PostThe public like Rishi a whole heck of a lot more than Boris. Your peer group might think differently but that's confirmation bias at work. Of Course Rishi managed to get caught up in Partygate too and that put a target on his back for the tabloids "oh look he's got a rich wife" which has tarnished him.
But as it is, Rishi was the government's preferred choice last time round and he basically predicted this mess if Liz pursued her policies and was vindicated. I've heard several Labour voters saying "I wish Rishi was in" and he retains a lot of love from all the people who got bounce-back-loans and furlough.
Liz was forced to instigate Rishi's "high tax" policies anyway and it seems obvious that's going to happen whoever is in charge. Remember that Rishi was chosen by, and supported by your beloved Boris as chancellor. Boris is not going to come in and slash taxes.
And for the last time I don't have a peer group of any kind. That's just your lot's childish fantasy. Some of us can come to our own conclusions.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
What would happen if nobody gets 100 nominations? Given the state of the government this sort of shambles in organisation is not inconceivable.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Borrowing to fund investment after a pandemic is hardly controversial.Originally posted by malvolio View Post
All very well saying what would happen if Truss got in, but I didn't see a lot of that proactive management of the economy before then - the focus was on pushing up taxes and borrowing to fund "investment" - which we are back to again it seems - so why not 18 months ago when the seeds of the current mess were being sown?
You're admitting you don't have any friends? I'm not sure who "my lot" are supposed to be, which demographic are you assuming me part of?And for the last time I don't have a peer group of any kind. That's just your lot's childish fantasy. Some of us can come to our own conclusions.
The public's view of Boris isn't a conclusion you can come to, it's empirical data.
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Today 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29

Comment