• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Be Careful Working Away

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    I can't see any point in trying to steal official ownership of a property in this day and age, as in the present case, besides squatting

    It seems a completely daft crime, as it is almost bound to come to light and the real owner or their successors in title reinstated and the fraudster prosecuted with ample evidence readily available.

    It's been much the same for hundreds of years, even when life was more uncertain and absent owners harder to trace, and long before the Land Registry was around, because if/when the true owner turned up they only had to request an Assize of novel disseisin to get their land or property back and they were usually successful.
    Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
      ... the fraudster prosecuted with ample evidence readily available....
      Step 1. Identify the fraudster.

      Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
        I can't see any point in trying to steal official ownership of a property in this day and age, as in the present case, besides squatting

        It seems a completely daft crime, as it is almost bound to come to light and the real owner or their successors in title reinstated and the fraudster prosecuted with ample evidence readily available.
        The fraudster in this case seems to have been the one who "sold" the house to an unsuspecting buyer and has since made off with the cash. Right or wrong (ok, wrong), I can still see the point of this from the criminal's perspective.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by d000hg View Post
          Seems quite an audacious attempt given how long it takes a sale to go through.

          A good time to remind people about this notification service - it will ping you of anything happening to the addresses you enter: https://propertyalert.landregistry.gov.uk/
          Good Shout!, beat me to it, I'm still getting alerts about old properties ( I know I should delete), but they give you fair warning of anything untoward about to happen.
          But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

          Comment


            #25


            Ah, dear dead days beyond recall when he was still funny.
            When the fun stops, STOP.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Gibbon View Post

              Good Shout!, beat me to it, I'm still getting alerts about old properties ( I know I should delete), but they give you fair warning of anything untoward about to happen.
              Yeah I never remove any so I get informed when past houses get sold again which is vaguely interesting as an excuse to be nosy online.
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                #27
                Maybe it is the original owner who is the real fraudster? He could have set up a clone of his own details, including a "fake" bank account, his end game being a payout from the solicitor's insurance.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by GJABS View Post
                  Maybe it is the original owner who is the real fraudster? He could have set up a clone of his own details, including a "fake" bank account, his end game being a payout from the solicitor's insurance.
                  You saying a man of the cloth is involved in criminal activity ?
                  "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                    You saying a man of the cloth is involved in criminal activity ?
                    The perfect cover

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                      You saying a man of the cloth is involved in criminal activity ?
                      Every murder mystery I ever did has a priest or vicar
                      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                      Originally posted by vetran
                      Urine is quite nourishing

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X