Originally posted by vetran
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Horizon IT Scandal: Postmasters await justice today
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Not just the big bosses, and don't spend ages on every bit, get enough easy wins on them and then charged and if guilty short jail sentences and big fines will suffice, the shame of a criminal conviction is enough. This will then free up resources to go after as many of the lower ranks who also submitted evidence such as the lawyers and SMEs. It needs to be such a wake up call that it deters other people asked to sign false statements etc to think twice. You can't tell me that some of the tulips working on Horizon were not cognisant of the prosecutions?But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger -
Were they involved too?Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
Not just the big bosses, and don't spend ages on every bit, get enough easy wins on them and then charged and if guilty short jail sentences and big fines will suffice, the shame of a criminal conviction is enough. This will then free up resources to go after as many of the lower ranks who also submitted evidence such as the lawyers and SMEs. It needs to be such a wake up call that it deters other people asked to sign false statements etc to think twice. You can't tell me that some of the tulips working on Horizon were not cognisant of the prosecutions?England's greatest sailor since Nelson lost the armada.Comment
-
oh I agree no perpetrator should escape but we need quick action on the ringleaders, a few decent fraud, extortion and corporate manslaughter convictions while the smaller prosecutions run on.Originally posted by Gibbon View PostNot just the big bosses, and don't spend ages on every bit, get enough easy wins on them and then charged and if guilty short jail sentences and big fines will suffice, the shame of a criminal conviction is enough. This will then free up resources to go after as many of the lower ranks who also submitted evidence such as the lawyers and SMEs. It needs to be such a wake up call that it deters other people asked to sign false statements etc to think twice. You can't tell me that some of the tulips working on Horizon were not cognisant of the prosecutions?
Use the small fry to catch the big fish.Comment
-
If I followed witness testimony correctly, the muppets at Fujitsu Support were pulling off transaction records from the Horizon Database, then dumping into Excel in order to manually find (rather than using a macro) and delete duplicate entries. However, it was apparent that by doing it manually, some duplicate transactions were overlooked thus showed up as shortfalls. The utter incompetence of Fujitsu beggars belief.Originally posted by vetran View Post
oh I agree no perpetrator should escape but we need quick action on the ringleaders, a few decent fraud, extortion and corporate manslaughter convictions while the smaller prosecutions run on.
Use the small fry to catch the big fish.
"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
Muppets indeed, why did the database indexes allow for duplication and if it was possible why didn't the application provide data sanity checks and recovery?Originally posted by Paddy View Post
If I followed witness testimony correctly, the muppets at Fujitsu Support were pulling off transaction records from the Horizon Database, then dumping into Excel in order to manually find (rather than using a macro) and delete duplicate entries. However, it was apparent that by doing it manually, some duplicate transactions were overlooked thus showed up as shortfalls. The utter incompetence of Fujitsu beggars belief.
Then we get to the part where the free money they stole from the Postmasters (not the other way around) was put into executive remuneration
Hanging in public by the bollocks for all Fujitsu management (who must of known their system was a wrongun) involved seems the only fair punishment.
Comment
-
define a duplicate!Originally posted by tazdevil View Post
Muppets indeed, why did the database indexes allow for duplication and if it was possible why didn't the application provide data sanity checks and recovery?
Then we get to the part where the free money they stole from the Postmasters (not the other way around) was put into executive remuneration
Hanging in public by the bollocks for all Fujitsu management (who must of known their system was a wrongun) involved seems the only fair punishment.Comment
-
I did quite a bit of work for Fujitsu back in the day (I had nothing to do with Horizon). Intelligence is very questionable in certain parts of the organisation.Originally posted by Paddy View Post
If I followed witness testimony correctly, the muppets at Fujitsu Support were pulling off transaction records from the Horizon Database, then dumping into Excel in order to manually find (rather than using a macro) and delete duplicate entries. However, it was apparent that by doing it manually, some duplicate transactions were overlooked thus showed up as shortfalls. The utter incompetence of Fujitsu beggars belief.Former IPSE member
My WebsiteComment
-
Unfortunately it doesn't.Originally posted by Paddy View Post
The utter incompetence of Fujitsu beggars belief.
Comment
-
A duplicate could be a transaction with the same value with the same time stamp (Y,M,D, Hr,Mn,Sec, MSec) however, each transaction should also have a unique identifier. To be “robust”, it should be possible to unplug the computer/terminal mid transaction and upon restart, the transaction should either complete or ask for a re-try.Originally posted by vetran View Post
define a duplicate!
ATMs are on the whole robust in that, even if in the end, you don’t take the cash, the transaction will be reversed and the money counted going back in the system. BTW: I am not an expert."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
good try but no cigar.Originally posted by Paddy View Post
A duplicate could be a transaction with the same value with the same time stamp (Y,M,D, Hr,Mn,Sec, MSec) however, each transaction should also have a unique identifier. To be “robust”, it should be possible to unplug the computer/terminal mid transaction and upon restart, the transaction should either complete or ask for a re-try.
ATMs are on the whole robust in that, even if in the end, you don’t take the cash, the transaction will be reversed and the money counted going back in the system. BTW: I am not an expert.
Seen this question stump many vendors.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment