Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The usual "experts" replying here after a quick Google, and the health and safety police wringing their hands...
Failed power steering does not make the car more dangerous, it just makes the steering heavier since the hydraulic rams which assist the underlying manual steering system wont work any more.
Do you think the manufacturers don't consider potential hydraulic failure when designing these items?
It's not uncommon in motorsport for power-steering racks from higher-spec'd models to be used on a rally car (road legal before anyone goes there) as generally they have a quicker steering action. The 205 GTi is a common example here.
I'd suggest you remove all the PAS components (bar the rack obviously) and just plug the rack where the pipes go.
You may need to change any shared drive belts for shorter versions from a non-PAS model.
Failed PAS does make the car more dangerous to drive, especially to others, as it affects your ability to control the vehicle.
Manufacturers do consider the fact that PAS might fail and the steering still works and car is still driveable. In the same sense that a car with a worn tires or break pads is driveable. Just not safe enough to pass MOT.
Any rally/race cars analogies are meaningless, the discussion is not whether a car can function without PAS, but whether it's safe/feasible to remove failed PAS fro ma car designed to have one.
The usual "experts" replying here after a quick Google, and the health and safety police wringing their hands...
Failed power steering does not make the car more dangerous, it just makes the steering heavier since the hydraulic rams which assist the underlying manual steering system wont work any more.
Do you think the manufacturers don't consider potential hydraulic failure when designing these items?
It's not uncommon in motorsport for power-steering racks from higher-spec'd models to be used on a rally car (road legal before anyone goes there) as generally they have a quicker steering action. The 205 GTi is a common example here.
I'd suggest you remove all the PAS components (bar the rack obviously) and just plug the rack where the pipes go.
You may need to change any shared drive belts for shorter versions from a non-PAS model.
And for modern cars with electric steering, does your blanket statement (based on a 1980s French car) still apply?
The usual "experts" replying here after a quick Google, and the health and safety police wringing their hands...
Failed power steering does not make the car more dangerous, it just makes the steering heavier since the hydraulic rams which assist the underlying manual steering system wont work any more.
Do you think the manufacturers don't consider potential hydraulic failure when designing these items?
It's not uncommon in motorsport for power-steering racks from higher-spec'd models to be used on a rally car (road legal before anyone goes there) as generally they have a quicker steering action. The 205 GTi is a common example here.
I'd suggest you remove all the PAS components (bar the rack obviously) and just plug the rack where the pipes go.
You may need to change any shared drive belts for shorter versions from a non-PAS model.
The OP was talking about a car with hydraulic PAS as (which you're well aware) was I..
HTH BIDI
The OP was, but you weren't. You made generic statements complaining about anyone who disagreed with you, then saying that "failed power steering does not make the car more dangerous" and that "consider potential hydraulic failure when designing these items?"
You then went on to talk about a 1980s French rally car, which you were quick to criticise another poster for when they called it a race car.
Perhaps you should really have suggested that the OP check if the car was fixed as part of the Mazda 2010 recall and then take it to a local mechanic for their opinion.
...but it's easier to call people names and make sweeping generalisations than actually be polite and useful
Many thanks for an actual, fact-based answer. It seems that other than very limited/emergency use it shouldn't be used and should certainly not be put in for an MOT.
It isn't really a competition but indeed this is a nicely black & white answer which is all I wanted. Knowing I cannot remove the PS as a way to make it pass the MOT is all I was after.
As for safety, it is well within my capacity to control the vehicle safely but the law is the law.
Many thanks for an actual, fact-based answer. It seems that other than very limited/emergency use it shouldn't be used and should certainly not be put in for an MOT.
It's just a back-up car, we already replaced it with a much newer one but I was loath to dump a usable vehicle, that's all.
It isn't really a competition but indeed this is a nicely black & white answer which is all I wanted. Knowing I cannot remove the PS as a way to make it pass the MOT is all I was after.
As for safety, it is well within my capacity to control the vehicle safely but the law is the law.
Sell it for scrap, or if you feel like being generous see if your local fire service wants it to practice on.
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR
I did specify rally car not a race car Mal - you may not need much steering effort for the roundy-roundy stuff but I can assure you rallies tend to need a tad more effort
Don't care. It's the same problem comparing competition cars to road going ones. And I didn't use that much steering deflection on the rally stages. Scandinavian flick anyone?
Many thanks for an actual, fact-based answer. It seems that other than very limited/emergency use it shouldn't be used and should certainly not be put in for an MOT.
It's just a back-up car, we already replaced it with a much newer one but I was loath to dump a usable vehicle, that's all.
It isn't really a competition but indeed this is a nicely black & white answer which is all I wanted. Knowing I cannot remove the PS as a way to make it pass the MOT is all I was after.
As for safety, it is well within my capacity to control the vehicle safely but the law is the law.
Comment