Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
10 dead in Yet Another US Shooting....
Collapse
X
-
How many mass airport shootings/bombings do we hear of? And how many school shootings? And why do you say that one is a magnet for psychotic nutters while the other isn't? And doe's that stand contrary to the empirical evidence? -
Why can't I get my GUN??? I want to shoot people, it sounds like fun!bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
If they can't allow guns in schools, then they can at least teach tactics of dealing with single shooter in a mass place - casualties can be reduced if victims don't act like lambs at slaughter.Comment
-
Meh?
In a bar in the US reading yet again about another shooting. Watched 'Putin' Black Super Lite talk about it all being 'routine' and Meh! As he said, routine, Meh!
Meh! NRA. Guns. Disillusioned youth. The reason I will never move my kids here.
Meh. Weak president.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
The design of school and college campuses likely means armed guards wouldn't be effective to deter shooters. You could still shoot 10 people before a guard gets to the classroom. The fact the guard kills you in the end isn't a problem as now you are infamous in death.Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View PostHow many mass airport shootings/bombings do we hear of? And how many school shootings? And why do you say that one is a magnet for psychotic nutters while the other isn't? And doe's that stand contrary to the empirical evidence?
Also notice I said transit not airports? Though I should have added in public spaces like streets and parking lots as well. The inside of airports are designed to make it hard to hide what you are doing.
Anyway this still means like in the incidents with Congress woman Gifford, outside Glasgow airport and on the Eurostar you are relying on people to tackle the assailant rather than waiting for help. You may be killed or maimed in doing so like on the Eurostar, but you will still be killed or maimed if you don't.
You can call people "nutters" but unless you know their medical records and are a psychiatrist you can't label someone as psychotic. Remember most killers go for the mental health angle to escape punishment or get a lesser punishment when in fact most of them are completely sane."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
No, it means that passengers using airports shouldn't be armed.Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View PostDoes that mean that we shouldn't have armed security at airports?
The logic isn't terribly difficult, but let me spell it out for you. When I saw that there was only one (unarmed) security guard at the school, I expected someone somewhere to say that if the students had been armed, then this tragedy couldn't have happened.
There is nothing to suggest that I think it was correct that the guard should have not been armed. Have you been taking lessons in logic and analysis from your creationist relatives?
Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
NSFW video clip (swearing)
I was brought up with guns.
I held my own shotgun licence from the age of 13.
I was completely paying for mine and my fathers shooting as a teenager via shooting competition prize money.
I'm very experienced in the use of guns, including some of the really big ones that spit out feckloads of bullets very fast.
Many of the places I work at have guns on the premises and for the last decade at least have armed guards on the gates, hell at least one had anti aircraft installations on the roof.
I have VERY strong feelings when it comes to gun control.
All the above is true, but this Aussie bloke sums up how I feel about guns in the hands of the public:-
BE WARNED THIS BLOKE SWEARS A BIT (ok a f**kload), NOT SAFE FOR WORK
BE WARNED THIS BLOKE SWEARS A BIT (ok a f**kload), NOT SAFE FOR WORK
Ok, you need to watch it on Youtube directly due to the way it's restricted.Last edited by TykeMerc; 3 October 2015, 08:14.Comment
-
Curious that you said 'transit' directly in response to my question specifically about airports.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostAlso notice I said transit not airports? Though I should have added in public spaces like streets and parking lots as well. The inside of airports are designed to make it hard to hide what you are doing.
Anyway, Have there been lots of mass shootings in parking lots?
So like Raoul Moat?Originally posted by SueEllen View PostAnyway this still means like in the incidents with Congress woman Gifford, outside Glasgow airport and on the Eurostar you are relying on people to tackle the assailant rather than waiting for help. You may be killed or maimed in doing so like on the Eurostar, but you will still be killed or maimed if you don't.
And the other two incidents in places with strict gun control?
I'm not sure how parity when it comes to random murders, between strict and loose gin control countries, say anything abut whether armed security should be present at places vulnerable to mass shootings.
You said that those places were specifically magnets for nutters. I think it's pretty safe to label a mass shooter of strangers as a nutter.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostYou can call people "nutters" but unless you know their medical records and are a psychiatrist you can't label someone as psychotic. Remember most killers go for the mental health angle to escape punishment or get a lesser punishment when in fact most of them are completely sane.
Anyway, almost ALL of them (the mass shooters in last few decades) were on SSRIs - which are well known to be linked to psychotic episodes in young people especially. Big pharma are in pulling govs strings though, of course.Comment
-
Well that would make the unarmed guard redundant.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostNo, it means that passengers using airports shouldn't be armed.
But the correct response would have been:
I'm talking about the students - not the guard
That's bizarre.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostHave you been taking lessons in logic and analysis from your creationist relatives?
Comment
-
yeah cuz teenage hormones and a 9mm are such a good mix.Originally posted by mudskipper View PostPastor on telly suggesting that the students should have been armed.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment