- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I've got a bad feeling about this
Collapse
X
-
He had a negative bluety on a quackhandle and was quadraspazzed on a lifeglug.
I look forward to your all knowing and likely sarcastic and unhelpful reply.
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Unless the videos are faked, his conviction looks a bit dodgy to me.
Ched Evans Was Wrongly Convicted of Rape on 20th April 2012 | Ched Evans Official Website
Obviously, if some guy jumps on an inebriated woman who hardly know what she is doing it should called rape, if she consents when sober it shouldn't, but there's a big grey area in between. In consensual sex between two similarly drunk/drugged people why should it be all the blokes fault?bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
She accuses two guys of raping her at the same time and one is considered innocent.
Doesn't really add up.
Either they were both guilty or they were both innocent.
One of the decisions was wrong. Which one?I'm alright JackComment
-
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostShe accuses two guys of raping her at the same time and one is considered innocent.
Doesn't really add up.
Either they were both guilty or they were both innocent.
One of the decisions was wrong. Which one?
Either way if he was let out of prison then he got the right to take an honest job instead of claiming benefits.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostAlso appeal was not allowed which is BS.
Either way if he was let out of prison then he got the right to take an honest job instead of claiming benefits.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostAlso appeal was not allowed which is BS.
Either way if he was let out of prison then he got the right to take an honest job instead of claiming benefits.
There are well-known companies who employ ex-offenders but they won't take him because he won't admit to being guilty."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
I am abit confused by the whole case - watching QT yesterday so just picking up snippets. I might be missing something.
How can he be guilty of rape if the 'victim' can't remember whether or not she consented? And the second guy involved was not guilty.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
Comment